Deriving to find speed (angular motion)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between translational speed and angular velocity in circular motion, specifically how to derive the equation v = rω. The lecturer's reference to taking a differential relates to understanding instantaneous angular velocity as d(θ)/dt, contrasting it with average angular velocity, defined as Δθ/Δt. Both average and instantaneous angular velocities can be used to calculate linear speed, but they yield different types of results: average speed over a finite interval versus instantaneous speed at a specific moment. The key takeaway is that for constant radius, the linear speed can be determined by multiplying the radius by either average or instantaneous angular velocity. Understanding this relationship is crucial for solving problems in angular motion.
Erenjaeger
Messages
141
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Going through a lecture recording from a lecture I missed the lecturer says "to get the relationship between translational speeds and angular velocities we will take a differential" what is that relationship she is talking about? does she mean converting between the two? The derivative was,
v=ds/dt = d(rθ)/dt
v = r d(θ)/dt ← the r was pulled out the front here because this was assuming an unchanging radius.
therefore v = rω
i understand that rω comes about because the d(θ)/dt was defined as the angular velocity, whereas i thought it was just Δθ/Δt that was angular velocity? not the derivative of θ with respect to t, which is was d(θ)/dt is right?
Aslo would someone be able to show me how I would apply this to a question?

Homework Equations


v=ds/dt = d(rθ)/dt
v = r d(θ)/dt
v = rω

The Attempt at a Solution


Would applying that last part, v=rω does that just mean to find the velocity (as a scalar) it is just the product of the radius and angular velocity ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you are asking is the relationship between speed and angular velocity for circular motion.

Angular velocity, like linear velocity, can be analysed using small finite changes in time or by continuos changes in time. In the first case, you have a small, finite time interval ##\Delta t## and a small, finite change of angle ##\Delta \theta##. The (average) angular velocity during this interval is:
##\omega = \Delta \theta / \Delta t##.

You could think of this as the measurement taken during an experiment.

Theoretically, however, you can also imagine the angle to be changing continuously with time, in which case ##\theta## is a function of time and you can get an instantaneous angular velocity by differentiating this function:

##\omega = \frac{d\theta}{dt}##

In both cases if ##r## is constant, then the linear speed is given by:

##v = r\omega##
 
PeroK said:
What you are asking is the relationship between speed and angular velocity for circular motion.

Angular velocity, like linear velocity, can be analysed using small finite changes in time or by continuos changes in time. In the first case, you have a small, finite time interval ##\Delta t## and a small, finite change of angle ##\Delta \theta##. The (average) angular velocity during this interval is:
##\omega = \Delta \theta / \Delta t##.

You could think of this as the measurement taken during an experiment.

Theoretically, however, you can also imagine the angle to be changing continuously with time, in which case ##\theta## is a function of time and you can get an instantaneous angular velocity by differentiating this function:

##\omega = \frac{d\theta}{dt}##

In both cases if ##r## is constant, then the linear speed is given by:

##v = r\omega##
oh right so the derivative is just for instantaneous angular velocity and then delta theta over delta time is the average, makes sense.
for v=rω does it matter how you work out the value ω or do you specifically have to either use average angular or instantaneous velocity ??
thanks.
 
Erenjaeger said:
oh right so the derivative is just for instantaneous angular velocity and then delta theta over delta time is the average, makes sense.
for v=rω does it matter how you work out the value ω or do you specifically have to either use average angular or instantaneous velocity ??
thanks.

In one case you get the average speed over the finite time interval. In the other case, you get an instantaneous speed as a function of time.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top