Engineering Troubleshooting an Op Amp Circuit: Iterative Problem-Solving Methods

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around troubleshooting an op-amp circuit where the user encounters the equation 0=0, indicating no solution. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly labeling circuit components and understanding the relationship between resistors in the equations. They highlight that the orientation of voltage coefficients in the equations significantly affects the outcome, with one participant suggesting an iterative problem-solving approach. The conversation also touches on the concept of negative resistance being unrealistic in practical scenarios, suggesting that incorrect arrangements of equations can lead to confusion. Ultimately, the iterative method is recommended for resolving circuit design issues effectively.
Vishera
Messages
72
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



af4mhjJ.png


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Here is my attempt: http://i.imgur.com/oKjwI8O.png

The problem is at the end, I get 0=0. What did I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vishera said:

Homework Statement



af4mhjJ.png


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Here is my attempt: http://i.imgur.com/oKjwI8O.png

The problem is at the end, I get 0=0. What did I do wrong?

Can you post a drawing of your opamp circuit, with the resistor names labeled? Thanks. :smile:
 
berkeman said:
Can you post a drawing of your opamp circuit, with the resistor names labeled? Thanks. :smile:

Sure, here is the drawing of the general circuit that I am aiming to design:
HRH4KpA.png


For that general circuit, the following equation applies:
ArKSEgn.png


Here is an example in the textbook:

TLjrkqx.png

fBCqinw.png
 
You sure it isn't Vo = 3V2 - 2V1?
 
rude man said:
You sure it isn't Vo = 3V2 - 2V1?

I agree with rude man.

In all cases an input to the negative side of an single op-amp circuit will be inverted, while an input to the positive side will not be inverted.
 
rude man said:
You sure it isn't Vo = 3V2 - 2V1?

Is there any specific reason why you can't the following equation to:

ArKSEgn.png


to:

vo=3v1-2v2?

I understand that I get 0=0 but why do I get 0=0? Algebraically speaking, why would it matter if it were vo = 3v2 - 2v1 or vo=3v1-2v2?
 
It might be helpful to write:

##3 v_1 - 2 v_2 = v_1 + 2(v_1 - v_2)##

Then a really simple circuit solution might come to mind.
 
Vishera said:
Is there any specific reason why you can't the following equation to:

ArKSEgn.png


to:

vo=3v1-2v2?

I understand that I get 0=0 but why do I get 0=0? Algebraically speaking, why would it matter if it were vo = 3v2 - 2v1 or vo=3v1-2v2?

combing your two equations the way you initially had them -R2/R1 would have to equal three.

that would imply that you have a negative resistance, which is impossible
 
I would solve this problem through an iterative method.

1. determine the relationship between R2 and R1 based on the V1 coefficient (hint R2/R1 = ?)
2. choose resistor values such that the relationship is true
4. determine R3 and R4 values based on the V2 coefficient and R1 and R2.
5. If needed go back to step 1
 
  • #10
donpacino said:
combing your two equations the way you initially had them -R2/R1 would have to equal three.

that would imply that you have a negative resistance, which is impossible

I understand that negative resistance is impossible in the real world, but shouldn't I at least get an answer with negative resistances in the math? I didn't even get an answer in the algebra which is confusing me.
 
  • #11
you got unlucky with the numbers. for that particular (wrong) arrangement of equations there is no solution. why don't you try it again with the correct number orientation. If you don't believe you got unlucky, change coefficients in the equation to some random combination and see what happens.

I do want to point out that the best way to solve these problems is an iterative process.
I recommend following the process I gave you above.
 
Back
Top