Designing pressure vessels that split.

AI Thread Summary
Designing carbon-fibre pressure vessels to ensure they split rather than explode upon rupture involves careful consideration of safety features and design elements. Incorporating burst disks or relief valves is essential for managing overpressure situations. A proposed solution includes molding a groove in the vessel wall to create a predictable splitting pattern, similar to perforations in toilet paper. Witness accounts from previous incidents highlight the importance of clear communication regarding vessel behavior during failure. Overall, balancing safety standards with innovative design can enhance the reliability of pressure vessels.
shavendome
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
If designing a carbon-fibre pressure vessel (over a aluminum sleeve), how can ensure your vessel splits if ruptured as opposed to exploding?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The normal approach is to design it so that it does neither. That is what applicable codes and standards are all about.
 
Sometimes though, other factors need also to be considered...Perceptions for one.
 
I don't understand what perceptions you refer to.

I've been on the investigation team after a pressure vessel split. These were cylinders, some with water, some oil, and one pneumatic. In all cases, the witnesses said they exploded. Of course, the pneumatic vessel ruptured with much more intensity.

If your intent is to protect against over pressure, then include a burst disk or a relief valve.
 
If designing a carbon-fibre pressure vessel (over a aluminum sleeve), how can ensure your vessel splits if ruptured as opposed to exploding?

Presumably this is in addition to having other safety featues such as a pressure relief valve or two.

Perhaps you could mould a groove in the wall so that when the design pressure is exceeded it splits in a predictable way. Bit like the perforations in toilet paper are intended to make it tear in the right place.
 
OK, that makes sense. Thank you for both replies, I really appreciate your help.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top