Destructive interference in a speaker value

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the position for complete destructive interference of sound waves emitted from two speakers. Speaker 1 is at the origin (0, 0) and Speaker 2 is at (0, 4.00) meters, emitting waves with a wavelength of 1.55 meters. The correct path difference for destructive interference is determined by the equation P2 - P1 = (n + 0.5)λ, where n must equal 2 for the smallest positive value of x, resulting in x = 0.127 meters. The initial incorrect assumption of using n = 0 led to erroneous calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sound wave properties and interference
  • Familiarity with the concept of path difference in wave physics
  • Knowledge of the Pythagorean theorem for distance calculations
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of wave interference in physics
  • Learn about the mathematical derivation of path differences in wave mechanics
  • Explore the application of the Pythagorean theorem in two-dimensional problems
  • Investigate the effects of varying wavelength on interference patterns
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on wave mechanics and sound interference, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to destructive interference.

jwbehm
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Speaker 1 is positioned at the origin and speaker 2 is at the position (0, 4.00) meters. They emit identical sound waves of wavelength 1.55 m, in phase. If you stand on the x-axis at (x, 0) meters, what is the smallest positive value for x for which you experience complete destructive interference?

Homework Equations



A^2+ B^2 = C^2
P2-P1= (n+.5)λ
V= λf

The Attempt at a Solution



My main question, though its possibly not where I am going wrong, is would n have to equal 0 for it to be lowest destructive interference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Excuse my poor handwriting. . .
scan0002-1.jpg


After plugging in all variables I came up with 9.94, which is incorrect. Is N supposed to equal 0 for this problem?

p1 is from the bottom speaker to the listener and p2 is the hypotenuse
 
The work you did seems to be on the right track, but perhaps use of different notation will clear things up. Since one speaker is located at the origin (0, 0) and the other speaker is located at (0, 4), we do not need the co-ordinates of the Point P1-P2 but rather its distance:

Since the Path Difference/ Wavelength = 0.5 (you had written n+0.5 but since we are looking for the smallest value, 0.5 will work), we can express the path difference as:
x units from the speaker at the origin
Sqrt(x^2 + 4^2) units from the speaker at (0, 4)

Thus: Path difference = Sqrt(x^2 + 4^2) - x
Wavelength = 1.55

The rest is for you to solve.
 
Hmm that gives me the answer I had already come up with which was incorrect, 9.935. Let me make sure I'm following you right

Path difference = Sqrt(x^2 + 4^2) - x

Here I'm plugging in wavelength/2, thus

.775 = Sqrt(x^2 + 4^2) - x
which brings me to
(x+.775)^2= x^2+ 4^2
which eventually goes to
1.55x-15.4=0
Thus x= 9.935. . . which is incorrect.
 
Ahh. I see my mistake. My mistake was assuming that the Path Difference/ Wavelength = 0.5. A value of 0.5 for the P.D./wavelength is not the smallest path difference. From a bit of trial and error, you will see that 2.5 (i.e. n=2, n+0.5 = 2,5) creates the smallest path difference with an answer of x=0.127.

I am sorry I have made such a basic error.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K