Details about the function n/ln(n)

  • Thread starter Thread starter tuhinrao
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on expressing n in terms of Y, where Y = n/ln(n). It is noted that for each Y, there are typically two corresponding values of n, except at Y = e, where they converge to n = e. The Lambert-W function is identified as a key tool for inverting the equation, allowing n to be expressed as n = ln(W_k(-1/Y)). The conversation highlights that standard functions often cannot be inverted, and the Lambert-W function's branches can yield complex solutions, though the primary interest lies in real values. Overall, the Lambert-W function provides a viable method for expressing n in terms of Y.
tuhinrao
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
From the file attached I would like to know the following.
if Y=n/ln(n), Is there a way of explicitly expressing n in terms of Y.


Relations I found are:

There are 2 values of n for every Y. Except at Y=e , the two values converge to n=e.
If n1 and n2 are the values of n
then
n1^n2=n2^n1.

So is there a way of finding n1, given n2?

What could be the possible type of functions involved?
From the graph it is seen that |n1-e| and |n2-e| are related inversely.
What could be this relation?
 

Attachments

  • n by ln n.png
    n by ln n.png
    24.7 KB · Views: 496
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No, there's no way to express n as a function of y using any standard functions. Of course, it's always possible to invent a new one for the purpose.
Mixtures functions of different types (polynomial, exponential, logarithmic, trigonometric..) are nearly always impossible to invert. E.g. y = x.exp(x), y = sin(x)/x, ...
 
There is a special function called the Lambert-W function (aka the Product-Log) which you can use to write n in terms of y. The Lambert-W function is the function w=W(x) such that
x = w exp(w).

If you invert your equation so that 1/y = ln(n)/n, and then let n = exp(a), this gives

\frac{1}{y} = a e^{-a}

We see that if we multiply both sides by -1 this will be in Lambert-W form, giving a = W(-1/y). Inverting n = exp(a), this gives

n = \ln W_k\left(-\frac{1}{y}\right).

Some very important notes: The Lambert-W function has two real-valued branches, corresponding to k = 0 and k = -1. Usually the k=0 branch corresponds to the desired solution. The other branches gives complex values for W, so inverting ln n = W(-1/y) is more complicated if want solutions for these others branches. However, since you seem mostly interested in real values you don't need to worry about this.
 
Thanks 'Mute'. Got my way through.

tuhinrao
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top