Detecting visible light EM radiation with an antenna

AI Thread Summary
Constructing a radio-like antenna to detect visible light is theoretically possible, but the antenna must be extremely small, on the order of hundreds of nanometers. The rapid oscillation of the electric field in visible light makes it challenging for current electronics to record the field directly. While photo receptors in the retina are not classical antennas, they operate at a molecular level that is significantly smaller than the wavelength of visible light. These receptors absorb electromagnetic energy and trigger neural signals without providing detailed information about the light. Efficient electromagnetic collection in the solar spectrum requires antennas that can match the size of the wavelengths involved.
quitequick
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
If visible light is part of the EM spectrum just like radio waves, is it possible to construct a radio like antenna (metal pronged structure) to detect them?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Actually yes, but the antenna needs to be REALLY REALLY tiny.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nantenna

The main problem is that the electric field oscillates so quickly that current electronics cannot operate fast enough to directly record the field.
 
Drakkith said:
Actually yes, but the antenna needs to be REALLY REALLY tiny.

By REALLY REALLY tiny, do you mean about the size of the photo receptors in our retina's?
 
About the size of the wavelength, some hundred nanometers (about 0.0000005 meters)
Our photo receptors are not classical antennas, and their active molecules are even smaller than the wavelength.
 
MikeGomez said:
By REALLY REALLY tiny, do you mean about the size of the photo receptors in our retina's?

From the wiki article I linked:

The wavelengths in the solar spectrum range from approximately 0.3-2.0 μm.[3] Thus, in order for a rectifying antenna to be an efficient electromagnetic collector in the solar spectrum, it needs to be on the order of hundreds of nm in size.

I don't know how large the molecules in our eyes are that actually detect the light, so I can't give you a comparison. The cells themselves are much larger than the wavelength, but only the molecule size matters I believe. Still, they aren't even antennas. They just absorb EM energy and change shape without determining any details about the light other than "Hey, I got a photon!".
 
That's right... see here

Ultimately, the absorption of a photon causes a bent molecule to straighten out. If this happens enough times within a short period and a very localized region (spatial/temporal summation), the net activity is enough to depolarize a membrane to originate a neural signal.
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
18K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
11K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top