Determination of a signal from its Fourier Coefficients

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving a discrete-time signal x[n] from its Fourier coefficients ak, specifically ak = cos(k*Pi/4) + sin(3*k*Pi/4) with a fundamental period N=12. The method proposed involves using Euler's formula to expand ak, but participants note that this approach becomes tedious when evaluating the sum multiple times. Suggestions include summing directly without conversion to Euler's form or simplifying the equation to identify patterns, particularly for specific values of k. Concerns are raised about the complexity of the process if the period increases, leading to the suggestion of creating a program to automate the calculations. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the need for more efficient methods to derive x[n] by hand.
ColdStart
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
letsa say i have an ak = cos ( k*Pi/4) + sin(3*k*Pi/4), the signal is discrete time, fundamental period N=12.

the way i would derive its x[n] is.. Sum(k=0, to 11 of: 0.5*exp(j*k*Pi/4) *exp(j*k*w*n) + 0.5*exp(-j*k*Pi/4) *exp(j*k*w*n) + (1/2*j)*exp(j*k*3*Pi/4) *exp(j*k*w*n) - (1/2*j)*exp(-j*k*3*Pi/4) *exp(j*k*w*n)

In other words, i expanded ak using eulers, and put it into the formula for finding x[n]... however as u see it turns out to be tedious process to evaluate this sum 12 times..

i was wondering, what is the more effective and QUICK method getting of x[n] by hand?

thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You mean X(t) right ?

Anyway, do not convert to euler as you see it looks terrible.

You can just sum it the way you see it.

Another choice would be to invest a little time to simplifying the equation.

For example whe k =4

cos ( k*Pi/4) = -1
sin (3*k*pi/4) =0
Usually this kind of patterns repeat.
 
no actually x[n] because its discrete time... wht if my period would be 40 or more? it would be more tedious then...
 
Well, perhaps you should look into creating a program to do the job. I personally do not know any mathematical acrobatics that can help you.
 
thanks anyway!
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top