Determine center point of offset circle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the center point of an offset circle, specifically an arc, using available dimensions. The key dimension labeled as X is calculated to be approximately 2.47, derived from CAD analysis. Participants clarify the significance of a line segment with a length of 3, which helps establish coordinates for a point on the arc. The equation of a circle is applied to find the radius and center point, confirming that the radius is tangent at a specified point. Ultimately, the calculations validate the derived radius and center coordinates, concluding with a successful resolution of the problem.
examorph
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
I am working on an algorithm which requires the coordinates for the center point of an offset circle. Dimensions available to find this are shown in the image below and the dimension required is labeled as X:
Circle Centre.JPG

The point at the very left of the arc is a quadrant therefore, the circle center also 2.27 away from the line with a dimension of 3. The actual value of x in this example is 2.47 (rounded), this was found using CAD however, I am trying to find an mathematical relation for this.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sorry, what is the significance of the line with length 3? At the moment all I'm seeing is an arc of a partial circle and then a line which doesn't seem to have any bearing on the characteristics of the circle.
 
I apologize for the confusion. Where I said "Circle" I should have said "Arc". All dimensions shown above are just what are available and not necessarily needed to determine the center point of the arc however, I think that in the case of the line with length 3, it would be useful as the combination of this with the distance 2.27 shows coordinates to a point on the arc.
 
It's an arc of a circle just to be clear though. We could always have drawn in the rest of this circle with dotted lines. So then the right end of the line segment of length 3 lies on this circle, correct?

edit: But then if that were the case, then the value of x would simply be (4.5-3)+3/2 = 3.

Unless there is some particular reason as to why the segment has a given length of 3, then the question can't be answered.
 
Last edited:
Actaully, there is sufficient information. Recall the 4.5 dimension.

OP indicates that radius is tangent at upper left point (let's call it point "A").
Let's use that point (A) as an origin in the x,y plane.

The equation of a circle is (x-a)^2 + (y-b)^2 = r^2 where point (a,b) is the center of the circle of radius r.

Since circle is tangent at point A, then a = r and the center lies on this axis, thus, b = 0.

The coorindates of the lower right point (let's call it "B") is as follows
x_b = 4.5 - 3.0 = 1.5
y_b = -2.27

Thus, the circle must satisfy
(x_b - a)^2 + (y_b - b)^2 = r^2
or
(x_b - r)^2 + (y_b - 0)^2 = r^2

==> r = ( (x_b)^2 + (y_b)^2 ) / ( 2 * x_b)

numerically,
r = 1.5^2 + (-2.27)^2 / (2 * 1.5)
= 2.47
 
Ahh you're right! Good work!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top