Determine the magnitude and direction of the force problem

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, a charge of 6 mC at each corner of a square is analyzed, with the calculated force on one charge being 5.6E7, confirmed as correct, and directed parallel to the square's diagonal due to repulsive forces. For the second question, regarding the placement of a third charge between a +4.75 µC and a -3.55 µC charge, the goal is to find a position where the net force is zero. The approach involves setting the electric fields from both charges equal to each other, leading to the condition E1 + E2 + E3 = 0. It is emphasized that the third charge must be collinear with the other two to ensure the electric field is zero at that point. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding electric forces and fields in determining charge placement.
wazzup
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I had a few questions which I'd appreciate some help with:

Q3) A charge of 6 mC is placed at each corner of a square .100 m on a side. Determine the magnitude and direction of the force on each charge. I essentially found the force on one corner ( by using x and y components )

Hence, for X = 2.29E7 + 0 + 3.24E7
For Y = -2.29E7 +3.24E7

I found the force to be 5.6E7. is this correct?

____________________________________________________________

Q4) A +4.75 micro C and a -3.55 micro C charge are placed 18.5 cm apart. Where can a third charge be placed so that it experiences no net force?

not sure how to go about this. Do I say:

Q1+Q2+Q3=0
Hence, F/E+F/E+F/E=0 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For Q3, realize that each of three charges imposes a force on one charge, and the resultant would point parallel with the diagonals of the square.

In Q4, the force on the third charge must be were the electric potential is zero, or the electric force imposed by the postive charge is equal and opposite to the force imposed by the negative charge.
 
For Q3, realize that each of three charges imposes a force on one charge, and the resultant would point parallel with the diagonals of the square.

Thats what I've tried doing..Since its a square, one of the charge will be in the x dimension only, the other charge will be only in y dimension and the third charge ( diagonally across ) will have both x and y component.

In Q4, the force on the third charge must be were the electric potential is zero, or the electric force imposed by the postive charge is equal and opposite to the force imposed by the negative charge.

I guess I understand what your saying but I do not know how to go about finding the force so as to enable me to get the equal and opposite of that.
All I know are the charges and distances.. Do I randomly pick a spot and put a charge there and try and see if the sum of the forces = 0 in x and y dimensions?
 
Your answer to Q3 is correct. The direction is parallel with the diagonal of the square, and since the sign is the same on all charges, the force is repulsive, i.e. pointing out of the square.

With regard to Q4, the force would be zero on any charge where the electric field would be zero, by definition of \vec{F} = \vec{E} * q.

Now where would the electric force = 0? \vec{E}_1 + \vec{E}_2 = 0, . . .
 
So for question 4, i'd set E1+E2+E3=0

and then plug in F/Q for E?

and further plug in Kq1q2/r^2 for F?

thanks
 
E1 = kq1/r12

E2 = kq2/r22

where r1 and r2 are the distances to the same point, where one is trying to find |E| = 0.

Also r1 = x1 - x, where x is position, and similarly for charge 2.

Also, the point has to be on the same line, i.e. colinear with the two charges since E is vector field and any non-colinear point would have a nonzero normal vector component.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top