Determine the singularities and evaluate residues

  • Thread starter Thread starter brydustin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Singularities
brydustin
Messages
201
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



f(z) = \frac{z*exp(+i*z)}{z^2+a^2}

Homework Equations



Res(f,z_0) = lim_z->z_0 (1/(m-1)!) d^{m-1}/dz^{m-1} {(z-z_o)^m f(z)}

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no clue how to do this because I don't know how to determine the order of the pole for a function of this form. For example, I could easily do this for a function like (1/(z^2+a^2))
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brydustin said:

Homework Statement



f(z) = \frac{z*exp(+i*z)}{z^2+a^2}

Homework Equations



Res(f,z_0) = lim_z->z_0 (1/(m-1)!) d^{m-1}/dz^{m-1} {(z-z_o)^m f(z)}

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no clue how to do this because I don't know how to determine the order of the pole for a function of this form. For example, I could easily do this for a function like (1/(z^2+a^2))

Hi there friend, consider expanding the numerator and the denominator separately in a Laurent series and then multiply them together to pick out the coefficient of the z^-1 term
 
Okay... . I'm now specifically asking how to compute it for the essential singularity, when z=∞ what is the residue?
 
I thought you needed to determine the singularities and their residues? I don't know if you've learned this yet, but if you have a function f(z)=g(z)/h(z) where h(z0)=0 and g(z0)!= 0 then the order of the pole at z0 is equal to the order of the zero at h(z0). The order of the zero can be found by looking at the order of the first non-vanishing coefficient in the series expansion of h(z) around z0. In this case, we have h(z)=z^2+a^2 so for example h(ia) = 0. If we try to expand in a series h(z)=c0 +c1(z-ia)+c2(z-ia)^2+... then c0=0 because h(ia) = 0 and c1=dh(z)/dz evaluated at z=ia which gives c1=2ia. That's non-vanishing so the order of the zero at h(ia) is 1. Hence there's a simple pole.

Then the residue at z=ia is given by g(ia)/h'(ia).

I could be wrong because it's been a while, but good luck.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top