Determine the x-coordinate of the mass center of the homogeneous hemisphere

Godblessyou
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine the x-coordinate of the mass center of the homogeneous hemisphere with the smaller hemispherical portion removed?

I know what the answer should be it's Xcm = 45/112 R

Homework Equations



The center of mass R of a system of particles is defined as the average of their positions, ri, weighted by their masses, mi


The Attempt at a Solution


dm = pi*p*(R^2 - x^2)
and then doing the (integral of x*(dm/dx)*dx)/integral from 0 to R (dm/dx)*dx
which finally gives me 3/2R but this is wrong. Please someone help thanks
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Godblessyou said:

Homework Statement


Determine the x-coordinate of the mass center of the homogeneous hemisphere with the smaller hemispherical portion removed?

I know what the answer should be it's Xcm = 45/112 R

Homework Equations



The center of mass R of a system of particles is defined as the average of their positions, ri, weighted by their masses, mi


The Attempt at a Solution


dm = pi*p*(R^2 - x^2)
and then doing the (integral of x*(dm/dx)*dx)/integral from 0 to R (dm/dx)*dx
which finally gives me 3/2R but this is wrong. Please someone help thanks

It's a little hard to tell without the integral in Latex notation, but did you remember to remove the smaller hemisphere? Why is your integration from 0 to R? And why isn't it a triple integral?
 
Yes I did remove smaller hemisphere from bigger which gave me 3/2R. I don't understand what you mean and what you are asking?
 
Godblessyou said:
Yes I did remove smaller hemisphere from bigger which gave me 3/2R. I don't understand what you mean and what you are asking?

I mentioned Latex to help you post your equations in a format that is more readable. Look at the Latex Tutorial thread in the Learning Materials area of the PF:

https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=151

I mentioned the triple integral, because what you wrote looks like a 1-D integration, and it would seem that you need to integrate over the volume of the object, no?
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top