Determing location where electric field is zero?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the location where the electric field is zero in a system with charges +3q and -2q. The user is struggling to understand how to eliminate the variable r from their calculations and is confused about the correct distances to use in their equations. There is a specific focus on the expansion of (r+2a)² and the importance of retaining the term 4ar in the calculations. The user expresses frustration over the lack of guidance in their textbook and the urgency of needing help before the assignment is due. Overall, the thread highlights the challenges of applying theoretical concepts to practical problems in electrostatics.
Ascendant78
Messages
327
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



photo.jpg


Homework Equations



See #1

The Attempt at a Solution



Based on the information in the question, I did what I could, but in the back of the book they have an answer of -9.9a and I have no idea how?

For the +3q on the right, I set the denominator to (2a+r)^2, since its distance would be the square of both the 2a between them as well as the additional r distance between the point and -2q. I am thinking they somehow managed to relate a to r to get rid of r, but I can't seem to figure out how I can do that or in some other way get rid of r?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why (r+2a) and not (r-2a) ?
Where is the b charge located in your system of coordinates? At x=2a or at x=-2a?
Why did you expand (r+2a)², does that make your calculations simpler?
 
All is correct except that (r^{2} + 4ar + 4a^{2}) is suddenly changed to
(r^{2} + 4a^{2}).
 
Last edited:
grzz said:
All is correct except that (r^{2} + 4a + 4a^{2}) is suddenly changed to
(r^{2} + 4a^{2}).

Thanks, but I'm not seeing how you are getting that? Wouldn't I want to square their combined sum?
 
I meant that the term '4ar' must be kept and not lost on the way.
 
grzz said:
I meant that the term '4ar' must be kept and not lost on the way.

Oh, yes I did correct that on my personal scribble, just not on that page. Even after I did that however, I still end up with r values in the equation that I can't seem to get rid of as shown here:
photo.jpg
 
This thing is due tomorrow and I haven't heard back from the professor either, so if anyone has any suggestions, I'm all ears? I did change up my signs, realizing the direction should be expressed as the point from the source of the charge TO the point I am trying to locate, rather than the reverse which I started with. It's frustrating because our book didn't explain how to approach a problem like this, but our professor threw it at us.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top