Determinging Acceleration and Distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter C42711
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
To determine the distance traveled by a rocket-powered sled accelerated to 444 m/s in 1.8 seconds, the correct approach involves calculating acceleration first. Using the formula a = (Vf - Vi) / t, the acceleration is found to be 247 m/s². With this acceleration, the distance can then be calculated using the equation d = vi + 1/2 * at². Substituting the values yields a distance of 400 meters. This method effectively utilizes constant accelerated motion formulas to arrive at the solution.
C42711
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
If a rocket-powered sled is accelerated to a speed of 444 m/s in 1.8s, then what is the distance that the sled travels?

So, my given:
vf= 444 m/s
t= 1.8 s

I don 't know what equation to use to find distance. I tried:
d=vi+1/2*at2 , but that didn't work. I just really don't know what equation to use. The answer should be 400m. Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Knowing only the time and velocities, you must use a formula that has only three quantities - and use it to find the 3rd one. Ideally, you would use a constant accelerated motion formula with d,t,Vi, and Vf. If you can't find that one, use one to find the acceleration and then use d=vi+1/2*at2 to find the distance.

There must be a list of constant accelerated motion formulas in your textbook.
The classic version is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equations_of_motion#Equations_of_uniformly_accelerated_linear_motion
 
have yo tried A = (Vf - Vi) / T?
once you have the acceleration value, the distance formula should work just fine
 
Most of the time a sled would be accelerated from rest. If it isn't, it tells you the initial velocity.
 
Need to find acceleration first and then plug its value into the correct equation that you stated.

a = (v-u)/t = (444-0)/1.8 = 247m/s^2

d = vi+1/2*at2

= 0 + 1/2*247*1.8^2

= 400m
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top