Determining linear velocity of pendulum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the linear velocity of a pendulum for testing protective equipment, exploring two methods: energy conservation and angular motion equations. The user encounters discrepancies between the two methods, particularly due to the assumption of constant angular acceleration in Method 2, which is not applicable in their scenario. They seek advice on how to accurately determine velocity at various points in the pendulum's swing, especially in an inverted design. The response emphasizes using conservation of energy to find velocities at different angles, suggesting that geometry can help derive the necessary height values. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of pendulum dynamics and the importance of correctly applying physical principles.
mmcsa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm trying to develop a pendulum to test protective equipment so I want to work out the length I'll need to generate a desired velocity and the necessary mass I'll need for a specific moment of inertia. I know there are multiple ways to solve for linear velocity with equating Ek and Ep being the most common. I have also tried to do this using angular acceleration, given θ ̈ = - g/l sin⁡θ however they both seem to give me different velocities, so I think I've gone wrong somewhere!

So I have 2 methods which should mathematically be the same but I can't seem to match them

Method 1: Ek = Ep
Ep=Ek
mgh = 1/2 mv^2
v=√2gh
h = L - (Lcos⁡(-θ))
v_bottom= √(2gL(1-cos⁡(θ)))
http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/physics/chapter8section5.rhtml

Method 2: equations of angular motion

angular acceleration= θ ̈ = - g/l sin⁡θ
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_pendulum#Stationary_pivot_point
ω^2= ω_o^2+2θ ̈ θ
V_tangential=ωr
r=radius of rotation=L for pendulum
V_tangential=L√(ω_o^2+2(-g/L sin⁡θ )θ ) Any top tips would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mmcsa said:
Method 2: equations of angular motion

angular acceleration= θ ̈ = - g/l sin⁡θ

This gives the angular acceleration when the pendulum angle is θ. As the angle varies (as the pendulum "falls"), so does the angular acceleration.

mmcsa said:
ω^2= ω_o^2+2θ ̈ θ

This assumes the angular acceleration is constant, which is not true for your situation.
 
Thanks jtbell,
Is there an alternative equation of motion I can use to work out the velocity at each point given the constantly changing angular acceleration of the system? Or is it possible with method 1 to find the resultant velocity for other cases not just at the bottom of the pendulum swing? For instance I am considering using an inverted pendulum style design where the mass is released at say 179° to vertical and it impacts at horizontal 90° (Vy=Vresultant) therefore the calculated h would be ~ pendulum rod length
 
Google ' Charpy Pendulum ' and ' Charpy impact testing '
 
mmcsa said:
Or is it possible with method 1 to find the resultant velocity for other cases not just at the bottom of the pendulum swing?
Yes, you can use conservation of energy for such situations: $$E_{k,final} + E_{p,final} = E_{k,initial} + E_{p,initial} \\ \frac 1 2 mv^2_{final} + mgh_{final} = \frac 1 2 mv^2_{initial} + mgh_{initial}$$ where presumably ##v_{initial} = 0##. You find the two h's from the corresponding angles by using some geometry. Of course m cancels out. This assumes that the mass of the pendulum string or rod is negligible compared to the mass of the bob.
 
  • Like
Likes mmcsa
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top