Determining Spring Constants in Different Gravity Environments

  • Thread starter Thread starter polyperson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constants Spring
AI Thread Summary
The spring constant, k, is determined using the formula k = (mass x gravity) / extension, which varies in different gravitational environments. On the Moon or in zero gravity, while k appears lower, the stiffness of the spring remains unchanged; only the extension changes due to reduced gravitational force. The true spring constant is best derived from horizontal experiments with mechanical loading rather than static weight hanging. The method involves applying a known force to measure displacement, confirming that k is a property of the material's intermolecular forces. The period of oscillation may be affected by the gravitational environment, potentially resulting in smaller distances covered during oscillation.
polyperson
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
To determine the spring constant, k, in a static experiment (i.e. suspending weights from a spring) we use the following expression;

k = (mass x gravity) / extension

But what if I was on the Moon (where gravity is 1/6 that of Earth) or in part of space where there is zero gravity? The spring is no less stiff when an Astronaut attempts to push or pull it, yet k has a much lower value.

Is it true that only the value of k derived from a horizontal experiment with mechanical loading gives us the true spring constant?

Thanks for your help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The way to determine the spring constant is to apply a known amount of force (N) to the spring and see how far extends. You can do this by hanging a known mass near a planet with known gravitational pull or any other way that would let you know how much force you are applying to the spring. There're many ways to do this.
 
Silly me. K remains constant because it is a function of the intermolecular or atomic forces in the steel. Only the amount of displacement changes!

Not quite sure about the period of the oscillations, though. Think it remains the same but with a smaller distance covered?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top