Determining static equlibrium reactions

AI Thread Summary
Determining the direction of forces and moments in static equilibrium can be challenging, particularly when analyzing systems like BCD. To find reactions at points A and D, it's essential to isolate members and create free body diagrams (FBDs), noting that there are no moments at joints B, C, and D. The direction of forces at internal joints is less critical than ensuring they are opposite to maintain equilibrium. Negative values in calculations may indicate an incorrect assumption about the direction of reactions, with downward reactions at D and upward at A being a possibility. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for solving equilibrium problems effectively.
martix
Messages
167
Reaction score
5
I'm having trouble getting my head around how to determine the direction of the forces of reaction and of moment/torque in static equilibrium systems.
For example how do I determine the reactions for the system attachment and why are they as they are.
 

Attachments

  • Reaction.png
    Reaction.png
    3.7 KB · Views: 509
Physics news on Phys.org
Come on? Cant anyone help me? This ought to be simple, but surprisingly no one knows.
 
martix said:
Come on? Cant anyone help me? This ought to be simple, but surprisingly no one knows.
Well, not that simple. Try isolating BCD and take FBD's of members BC and CD. Note that there can be no moments at joints B, C, and D. Solve for the reactions at B and D, then analyze AB as a cantilever with a distributed load and concentrated load at the far end. Assume small deflections. Note that your units for F are stated incorrectly, it should be in kN, not kN-m.
 
I am not familiar with everything the exact English terminology so there may be small discrepancies in what I'm trying to say.
Anyway, didn't notice the F units thing...
Well I do know that the directions do no matter for the internal joints, all that is important is that they are opposite for each joint so as to keep the equilibrium.
The problems I'm trying to solve are usually only about finding the magnitude, they don't involve vector quantities. So that's why I need to determine the direction(i.e. sign in the equilibrium equation) of the forces on the end points. Which for this case are A and D.
But then again - the solution has some negative numbers which don't really make sense to me.
Anyway, thanks.
 
martix said:
I am not familiar with everything the exact English terminology so there may be small discrepancies in what I'm trying to say.
Anyway, didn't notice the F units thing...
Well I do know that the directions do no matter for the internal joints, all that is important is that they are opposite for each joint so as to keep the equilibrium.
The problems I'm trying to solve are usually only about finding the magnitude, they don't involve vector quantities. So that's why I need to determine the direction(i.e. sign in the equilibrium equation) of the forces on the end points. Which for this case are A and D.
But then again - the solution has some negative numbers which don't really make sense to me.
Anyway, thanks.
I don't know what numbers you are getting because you haven't shown your work, but if you get negative numbers it might just mean that you assumed the wrong direction for the reactions at A and D, or, if the solution was given to you with a negative value, it might just mean that the direction of the force at the end point reaction is down. Perhaps you can visualize that the couple produced by the equal but opposite forces, F, tend to attempt to rotate frame BCD counter clockwise, resulting in a downward reaction at D and an upward reaction at A. Also note that at A, there must be a reactive moment acting at that end point.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top