Determining the Net Force on a Wedge and Block System

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the net force on a wedge and block system where a block remains stationary on a frictionless wedge. Given the masses (M = 20.0 kg, m = 4.00 kg) and the angle (theta = 34.0 degrees), participants emphasize the application of Newton's second law of motion. One user expresses confusion about the reference frame and the normal force in their free body diagram. The importance of providing detailed calculations and clear attempts at solutions is highlighted, as vague descriptions are insufficient for assistance. Clarity in the approach is essential for solving the problem effectively.
PAstudent
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
For the situation shown in the diagram, the block of mass m remains in place on the sloping front of the accelerating wedge, even though that sloping front is frictionless. Given these values, M = 20.0 kg, m = 4.00 kg, and theta= 34.0, calculate the net force acting on the wedge plus block (M+m) system.

Force problem.png


Homework Equations


Newton's second law of motion

The Attempt at a Solution


At first, I tried turning the frame of reference so my normal force for the block was on the y-axis on my free body diagram. However, when I was looking at it more, I was confused on what I was actually trying to find with the wedge.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PAstudent said:

Homework Statement


[/B]
For the situation shown in the diagram, the block of mass m remains in place on the sloping front of the accelerating wedge, even though that sloping front is frictionless. Given these values, M = 20.0 kg, m = 4.00 kg, and theta= 34.0, calculate the net force acting on the wedge plus block (M+m) system.

View attachment 88942

Homework Equations


Newton's second law of motion

The Attempt at a Solution


At first, I tried turning the frame of reference so my normal force for the block was on the y-axis on my free body diagram. However, when I was looking at it more, I was confused on what I was actually trying to find with the wedge.
A vague description of an attempted method does not qualify as a posted attempt. We need to see your working.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top