Determining the polarity of mutually inducted voltages using the dot convention

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the polarity of mutually induced voltages in two coils, L1 and L2, using the dot convention. According to the dot convention, when current enters the dotted terminal of a coil, it induces a positive voltage at the dotted terminal of the other coil. The participants clarify that the induced voltage in L1 is negative while in L2 it is positive, based on the current's entry and exit points. There is some confusion regarding the interpretation of voltage rises and drops in the context of the circuit, leading to a suggestion for clarification with the professor. The importance of understanding the dot convention in relation to the induced voltages is emphasized.
stobbz
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determine the polarity of the induced voltages in L1 and L2.
[PLAIN]http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/730/31761140.jpg

According to the dot convention rule, when current enters the dotted terminal of a coil,the polarity of the voltage it induces in the other coil is positive at its dotted terminal.

And vice-versa, when current leaves the dotted terminal of a coil, the polarity of the voltage it induces in the other coil is negative at its dotted terminal.

The answer states that the mutually induced voltage in L1 is negative and that in L2 it is positive.

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



It seems a very simple question but I can't arrive to any other answer other than both mutually induced voltages being negative.

I've searched extensively to try and figure out where my misunderstanding lies, but no luck.

All help appreciated!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
According to the dot convention rule, when current enters the dotted terminal of a coil,the polarity of the voltage it induces in the other coil is positive at its dotted terminal.

Looking at L1, where does the current enter (dot or no dot?) and exit (dot or no dot?) the coil What does this mean for L2?

Looking at L2, where does the current enter (dot or no dot?) and exit (dot or no dot?) the coil What does this mean for L1?
 
Zryn said:
Looking at L1, where does the current enter (dot or no dot?) and exit (dot or no dot?) the coil What does this mean for L2?

Looking at L2, where does the current enter (dot or no dot?) and exit (dot or no dot?) the coil What does this mean for L1?

The current enters the dotted terminal of L1. My understanding is, that means a positive voltage will be induced at the dotted terminal of L2.

Going round the circuit in the direction of the current, wouldn't this produce a voltage rise across L2 (from undotted to dotted terminal)? In other circuits of this type, usually involving meshes, I have been adding voltage drops and subtracting voltage rises. Wouldn't a voltage rise be considered negative here?(May be where I am going wrong?)

At L2, the current enters the undotted terminal, so a negative voltage will be induced at the dotted terminal of L1. To me, this would signify another voltage rise, this time across L1 (from dotted terminal to undotted).

Thanks for replying.
 
Yes you're exactly right, given your justification.

I believe however, that the question is looking for the voltages induced w.r.t. the dot's, rather than w.r.t. the circuit.

This may be an ambiguity worthy of clarification with your professor or whomever marks your papers.
 

Attachments

  • Mutually Induced Voltages Answer.JPG
    Mutually Induced Voltages Answer.JPG
    16.7 KB · Views: 978
Good to know I'm not too far off the mark, thanks a lot for the clarification Zryn.
 
Thread 'PLL - How to find all the gains of a PI corrector and fix Ki ? MATLAB'
Hello everyone, it's not really for my homework (because I'm not at school anymore) but I'm new and I don't know how to start a new forum. I've never done automatic before and I need help. I have a 2nd ordre PLL on MATLAB, with an NCO and a PI corrector; the PLL works via the Mid/End algorithm (that's part is ok). I need to find the link between the theoretical formulas and their values in the code to find the value of the gain Ki, and possibly that of Kp if it's not correct. Unfortunately...
Thread 'Have I solved this structural engineering equation correctly?'
Hi all, I have a structural engineering book from 1979. I am trying to follow it as best as I can. I have come to a formula that calculates the rotations in radians at the rigid joint that requires an iterative procedure. This equation comes in the form of: $$ x_i = \frac {Q_ih_i + Q_{i+1}h_{i+1}}{4K} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i-1} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i+1} $$ Where: ## Q ## is the horizontal storey shear ## h ## is the storey height ## K = (6G_i + C_i + C_{i+1}) ## ## G = \frac {I_g}{h} ## ## C...
Back
Top