Mesh Analysis / Sign Convention - Conceptual Problem

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of mesh analysis in circuit analysis, specifically focusing on the use of the passive sign convention and the assignment of polarities for voltage sources and resistors in a given circuit diagram.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in using mesh analysis while adhering to the passive sign convention, particularly in assigning polarities to components like the 6V voltage source and resistors.
  • Another participant explains that potential drops occur in the direction of current flow and emphasizes the need to account for separate potential drops in shared components.
  • A participant shares their mesh equations but indicates that they are still obtaining incorrect results, suggesting a misunderstanding in their approach.
  • One participant points out that the 6V source has different polarities in different loops, which could lead to confusion, and suggests consistently choosing one polarity for clarity.
  • There is a question raised about how to determine the correct polarity for the 6V source, as it seems to yield different results depending on the mesh current considered.
  • A later reply clarifies that voltage sources have a fixed polarity that must be used, contrasting them with passive components like resistors.
  • One participant notes that their textbook does not adhere to the passive sign convention, leading them to adjust the labeling of voltage sources in their analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how to assign polarities to the voltage source, with some suggesting flexibility in polarity assignment while others emphasize the fixed nature of voltage sources. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to consistently apply the passive sign convention in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential confusion arising from the simultaneous assignment of different polarities to the same voltage source in different loops, indicating a need for clarity in the application of mesh analysis.

Zatman
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am having a little trouble using mesh analysis. I'm trying to stick rigorously to the passive sign convention, as I'm told that this is sensible.

Consider the circuit diagram attached, where I have added the mesh currents in orange. In red are the polarities for the components where it is obvious - of course, using the passive sign convention.

attachment.php?attachmentid=64166&d=1385058228.jpg


How do I assign the polarities for the other components, i.e. the 6V voltage source and the 5 and 1 ohm resistors? For example, the 6V source cannot be assigned a polarity that satisfies the passive sign convention for both mesh 1 and mesh 3.

As it turns out, assigning positive to the top and negative to the bottom gives the correct answer (after the mesh analysis), but I'm not sure how you can tell.
 

Attachments

  • circuit.jpg
    circuit.jpg
    8.7 KB · Views: 2,358
Physics news on Phys.org
Potential drops in the direction of the current flow. Since mesh currents are treated as separate currents in shared components (like the 5 and 1 ohm resistors in your example), there's a separate potential drop associated with each current.

attachment.php?attachmentid=64170&stc=1&d=1385059766.gif


You need to account for both changes in potential when you write the equation for a loop.
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    1 KB · Views: 1,908
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you gneill, that makes sense. However, I still get the incorrect equations when I try to analyse my circuit, so I guess I'm still missing something.

attachment.php?attachmentid=64173&d=1385063770.jpg


I get, for mesh 1, 2 and 3 respectively,

2i_1+5(i_1-i_2)+6=0
\Rightarrow7i_1-5i_2=-6

12+(i_2-i_3)+5(i_2-i_1)=0
\Rightarrow 5i_1-6i_2+i_3=12

4i_3+6+(i_3-i_2)=0
\Rightarrow -i_2+5i_3=-6

Not sure what I'm doing wrong. :(
 

Attachments

  • circuit2.jpg
    circuit2.jpg
    10.9 KB · Views: 1,818
Well, for one thing, in loops 1 and 3, the 6V source has different polarities simultaneously. This can only lead to confusion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesh_analysis

It's best to pick one polarity and adjust the sign of the voltage according to the assumed direction of the current when writing your mesh equations. There is no rule that says voltages must always be positive.
 
Okay, but that raises the question: how do I know which way to assign the polarity to the 6V source? I could either assign it to match up with the mesh 1 current (which gives the correct answer) or the mesh 3 current (which gives the incorrect answer).
 
Zatman said:
Okay, but that raises the question: how do I know which way to assign the polarity to the 6V source? I could either assign it to match up with the mesh 1 current (which gives the correct answer) or the mesh 3 current (which gives the incorrect answer).

Voltage sources are not passive components like resistors. They have a fixed polarity which you must use. A voltage source always produces the same potential difference across its terminals regardless of the current flowing though it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
gneill said:
Voltage sources are not passive components like resistors. They have a fixed polarity which you must use. A voltage source always produces the same potential difference across its terminals regardless of the current flowing though it.
Got it, thanks!

For the record, the book I'm using doesn't use the passive sign convention. So I've got into the habit of ignoring their labelling and redoing it. So in this example I changed the labelling of the voltage sources!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
4K