- #1

BenMur

- 1

- 0

Hello.

I have been going through some old OU books on the sciences and started working through an excercise when I came to a stumbling block. I have come here in the hope that someone may be able to shed some light on my problem. This is all for personal study as I am not enrolled on any courses in the subject and just wish to expand my mind.

The exercise I am going through is part of an old OU science module that belonged to my mother. Unfortunantely she no longer has the videos which I need to explain to me what I need to do next to correct my results.

Basically the exercise makes the assumption that the shadow cast by the Earth on to the surface of the moon during a solar eclipse is the same size as the Earth itself. Now whilst I have an idea why this is not the case the assumption stands through most of the exercise in order to show a method of calculation to the student.

Through the use of the photos of the moon showing different phases of a partial eclipse I am asked to make measurements to estimate the radius of the Earth in the photograph.

Before I explain any more I would like to show everything I have calculated thus far in the exercise.

(Exact correct figures may not be used during the exercise as the learning experience is more to do with the approach than the results)

The radius of the Earth's shadow in the photograph is:

less than 7.2 cm (upper limit)

more than 6.4 cm (lower limit)

Radius of Earth's shadow in the photograph (R

Radius of the Moon in the photograph = (R

Therefore the Radius of the Earth is 2.47 times bigger than the radius of the moon.

R

Max Ratio = 7.2/2.65 = 2.72

Min Ratio = 6.4/2.85 = 2.25

Therefore R

Now R

So 6200/2.47 = R

R

I then calculate the limits of uncertainty for distance using the earlier numbers and get:

R

Having gotten this far through the exercise I read the following:

"One word of caution about this calculation of R

Unfortunately I don't have this TV program and have been unable to obtain a copy or find anything similar avaliable. So I have come here in the hope that one of you brilliant minds can assist me in completeing this exercise by explaining to me what I am missing and how to correct my inital results.

I have been going through some old OU books on the sciences and started working through an excercise when I came to a stumbling block. I have come here in the hope that someone may be able to shed some light on my problem. This is all for personal study as I am not enrolled on any courses in the subject and just wish to expand my mind.

## Homework Statement

The exercise I am going through is part of an old OU science module that belonged to my mother. Unfortunantely she no longer has the videos which I need to explain to me what I need to do next to correct my results.

Basically the exercise makes the assumption that the shadow cast by the Earth on to the surface of the moon during a solar eclipse is the same size as the Earth itself. Now whilst I have an idea why this is not the case the assumption stands through most of the exercise in order to show a method of calculation to the student.

Through the use of the photos of the moon showing different phases of a partial eclipse I am asked to make measurements to estimate the radius of the Earth in the photograph.

Before I explain any more I would like to show everything I have calculated thus far in the exercise.

(Exact correct figures may not be used during the exercise as the learning experience is more to do with the approach than the results)

## Homework Equations

## The Attempt at a Solution

The radius of the Earth's shadow in the photograph is:

less than 7.2 cm (upper limit)

more than 6.4 cm (lower limit)

Radius of Earth's shadow in the photograph (R

_{E}) = 6.80cm +/- 0.40cmRadius of the Moon in the photograph = (R

_{M}) 2.75cm +/- 0.1cmTherefore the Radius of the Earth is 2.47 times bigger than the radius of the moon.

R

_{E}= 2.47 R_{M}

Limits of UncertaintyLimits of Uncertainty

Max Ratio = 7.2/2.65 = 2.72

Min Ratio = 6.4/2.85 = 2.25

Therefore R

_{E}= (2.47 +/- 0.22) R_{M}Now R

_{E}= 2.47 R_{M}(Text book uses a figure of 6200km for Earth's radius)So 6200/2.47 = R

_{M}R

_{M }= 2510I then calculate the limits of uncertainty for distance using the earlier numbers and get:

R

_{M}= 2510 +/- 231 km**This is the extent of my working out**Having gotten this far through the exercise I read the following:

"One word of caution about this calculation of R

_{M}:*throughout Section 3 [the above]*you make the assumption that the shadow of the Earth at the Moon is the same size as the Earth itself. As you will see in the TV programme, this is an unjustified assumption that leads to a considerable error in the value obtained for R_{M}. However, the programme also shows how to correct this error, so be prepared to adjust your value of R_{M}after viewing."Unfortunately I don't have this TV program and have been unable to obtain a copy or find anything similar avaliable. So I have come here in the hope that one of you brilliant minds can assist me in completeing this exercise by explaining to me what I am missing and how to correct my inital results.

Last edited: