Difference b/w Retrorockets & Vernier thrusters

  • Thread starter Thread starter sorter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
AI Thread Summary
Retrorockets and vernier thrusters serve different purposes despite their similar appearance. Vernier thrusters are designed for attitude control, providing low thrust and being restartable throughout a mission. In contrast, retrorockets are typically fired once to significantly alter an orbit. The discussion also notes that nozzle color differences may indicate varying metal choices or the use of ablative materials to prevent melting. Clarification was made that verniers are indeed for orientation control, not altitude control.
sorter
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
these two term are different but from photos the two components looks quiet alike..i had done some search but can't grasp ACTUAL difference b/w the two as both are small rocket auxillary nozzles...

by the way I have been able to discover what is in the first photo but can't identify a retro/vernier rocket in the 2nd..help will be appreciated.
33v2pds.jpg

34j6hph.jpg



Apart from this have you noticed the difference in color of the nuzzle in first photo...metal choice difference I suppose
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both retros and verniers are rockets, so they will look generally the same as any other. The difference is what they're designed to do.

Verniers are used for attitude control, so they will generally be low thrust, restartable motors designed to be used throughout a mission. Retros are typically fired once to change an orbit by a large degree.

The nozzles in the picture are likely painted with some sort of ablative material to keep the metal from melting.
 
Retros used for deorbital/orbital insertions..ok thnx got it. But verniers used for altitude control?...ths makes no sense in the presence of large primary nozzles which are to take care about altitude. I thing verniers are for orientation control.
 
Attitude control, not altitude.
 
Venus does not have a magnetosphere, so the Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) environment shall be much worse than in a LEO environment. Looking to the std radiation models for Venus, the standard radiation-hard space level electronic component with tested immunity LET = 85 MeV-cm2/mg seems not enough, so, for example, a 1cm2 Si die will suffer considerable flux above this level during a long mission (10 years for example). So, the question is, usually we are not paying attention to latch-up...
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/
Thread 'SpaceX Starship development: 7th flight January 10'
Watch the progress live This is a fully stacked Starship (top) and Super Heavy (bottom). A couple of too-small-to-see cars near the bottom for scale, I also added a Saturn V and the Statue of Liberty for comparison. 120 meters tall, about 5000 tonnes when fully fueled. Twice the mass and over twice the thrust of Saturn V. The largest rocket ever built by mass, thrust, height, and payload capacity. N1 had the largest diameter.[/size] But its size is not the revolutionary part. It is designed...
Back
Top