Difference between a solenoid and a stack of loops

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the differences between the magnetic field (B field) formulas for a stack of loops and a solenoid. The B field for a stack of N circular loops is given by B = mu0 * N * I / (2a), while for a solenoid it is B = mu0 * N * I / l, with 'a' being the loop radius and 'l' the solenoid length. It is emphasized that Ampere's law applies to the solenoid's interior, assuming uniformity, whereas the stack of loops' formula is relevant at the endpoints. The two formulas are derived under different assumptions and apply to different regions, highlighting that the solenoid does not need to be infinite for its formula to hold. Ultimately, the B fields calculated for these configurations are valid in distinct contexts, leading to their differing results.
warrenchu000
Messages
14
Reaction score
9
The B field at the center of a stack of N circular loops each carrying current I is
B = mu0 * N * I / (2a)
where a is the radius of the loop, derived using Biot-Savart law.

The B field inside a solenoid is
B = mu0 * N * I / l
where l is the length of the solenoid, derived using Ampere's law.

Yet everywhere I searched it is always stated that a solenoid can be thought of as a stack of circular loops. Then why are the results different? Why can't I use Ampere's law on the stack of loops to get mu0 * N * l?

It is also stated that in a solenoid the B field at the ends of the solenoid is 1/2 of the B field inside the solenoid, or
B = mu0 * N * I / (2l)

Could that be it? That is, the B field calculated using Biot-Savart law for stack of loops is the same as that for a solenoid B field but ONLY at the ends of the solenoid?

I am citing Figures 28.14 and 28.24 in University Physics by Young and Freedman, 13th edition.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like your "stack" has a negligible length.

The formula for the solenoid assumes an "infinite" length.

Different setups lead to different formulas with different results.

Could that be it? That is, the B field calculated using Biot-Savart law for stack of loops is the same as that for a solenoid B field but ONLY at the ends of the solenoid?
a and l are different things.
 
No. There is nothing about the equation for the B field of a stack of rings being valid only for a short length. The number of loops is N and can be as large as I want. Moreover, the solenoid does not have to be infinite for the equation to be valid.

Of course I recognize the quantity "a" in the loop equation is the radius of the loop and "l" in the solenoid equation is the length of the solenoid. I am trying to reconcile these 2 formulas.

B = mu0 * N * I / (2a) for a stack of loops
B = mu0 * N * I / l for a solenoid

I want a serious answer, not just an off-the-cuff answer. I have been researching this for quite some time and have not found any article that addresses this question. Thank you for your help.
 
warrenchu000 said:
No. There is nothing about the equation for the B field of a stack of rings being valid only for a short length. The number of loops is N and can be as large as I want. Moreover, the solenoid does not have to be infinite for the equation to be valid.
Just check where these equations come from, and which assumptions were made to derive them. If the stack of rings is allowed to have a variable length, this length would have to appear in the formula.

In the same way, I recognize the formula for solenoids, and it uses the approximation that the solenoid is very long relative to its diameter.
I want a serious answer
I posted one.
Thank you for your help.
You're welcome.
 
I believe I have the answer.

B = mu0 * N * I / l is for the INSIDE of a solenoid far from the ends.

B = mu0 * N * I / (2a) is for a stack of loops on the END POINT of the stack.

Ampere's law was used to find the B field in the solenoid where it is ASSUMED it is uniform.

Ampere's law cannot be used for the B field of a stack of loops at points OUTSIDE the stack because the path does not enclose any current.

Moreover the B field on the outside is ASSUMED to be zero when applying Ampere's law. That is not true at the ends of the solenoid.

So these 2 formulas are for 2 completely different regions.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top