Difference between photon and electron collisions with atoms

AI Thread Summary
Electrons and photons interact with atoms differently due to the charge of electrons, which allows them to engage electromagnetically, while photons interact based solely on energy. Photons can be completely absorbed by atoms, whereas electrons cannot; instead, electrons may transfer energy through collisions. The Compton effect illustrates how photons can collide with electrons, losing energy and changing direction, while electron collisions are more complex and involve electromagnetic interactions. Both types of collisions can lead to atomic excitation, resulting in light emission, with electrons contributing to phenomena like x-ray cathodes and neon signs, while photons are involved in fluorescence and glow-in-the-dark materials. Understanding these differences is crucial for applications in physics and material science.
Daveami
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Would anyone be able to explain the main differences between the effect of electrons and photons colliding with atoms in the ground state.

As far as I understand they are very similar as both cause excitation and in some cases ionization.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Dave
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One difference is that the electron is charged while the photon is not. So the photon will collide with the atom based solely on its energy, while the electron will interact electromagnetically with the electrons.

In addition, a photon can be completely absorbed while an electron cannot.
 
The photon could collide with an electron from the atom as described in the Compton effect, pushing the electron a little. The photon will loose some of its energy (therefore frequency as well) and fly off in another direction. An electron could bump into another electron as described as well, but they would not collide like you would think of two marbles, but rather electromagnetically, like dulrich already said.

But both can exite an atom, which might later emit a photon and glow. The electron collision resulting in light is something one finds in an x-ray cathode, or a regular gas lamp like a neon sign. The photon collision resulting in light would be all flouroscense, like one has in these bright colors and most glow-in-the-dark stuff as well.
 
Brilliant, thank you both for your help!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top