Difference between these equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter STEMucator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the differences between two equations of motion: v_2 = v_1 + a Δt and v_2^2 = v_1^2 + 2a Δd. The first equation calculates final velocity based on initial velocity, acceleration, and time, while the second relates final and initial velocities to acceleration and displacement. Both equations apply to uniformly accelerated motion in a straight line, but they omit different variables; the first lacks displacement, and the second lacks time. Despite initial assumptions, both equations can yield the same results under uniform acceleration. Understanding these equations is essential for analyzing motion in physics.
STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140
I've been curious about this for awhile. What's the difference between the following two equations:

##(1) v_2 = v_1 + a \Delta t##

##(2) v_2^2 = v_1^2 + 2a \Delta d##

My hunch is that ##(1)## represents the final speed in a non-parabolic scenario while ##(2)## is used when the object travels in an arc.

I was curious about this because the two equations won't produce the same answer when asked to find the "final velocity" of an object.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zondrina said:
##(1) v_2 = v_1 + a \Delta t##

##(2) v_2^2 = v_1^2 + 2a \Delta d##
2 is used when an object travels in a straight line.Let's put it this way
##v=u+at##
##v^2=u^2+2as## (v= final velocity,u = initial velocity)
First equation is just a rearrange of acceleration equation which is
##a=\frac{v-u}{t}##
The second equation is formed by combining the equations
##s=\frac{1}{2}(u+v)t## and ##v=u+at## (First equation)
These equations are known as Equations of motion.
Each equation has one quantity absent,in equation 1,it's s
In equation 2,It's t.

Yes,the two equations looks similar,because it's subject is v.However,two equations have different quantities.

If for example,u= 0. v= 10m/s .a= 2
Then time taken is 5 sec
and distance traveled is 25m.
What's the problem in this?Does this look similar?Does distance and time look similar?Note:s is displacement,v and u is velocity.They are not distance and speed
All the equations of motion applies if acceleration is uniform and object move in a straight line
 
Last edited:
Zondrina said:
I've been curious about this for awhile. What's the difference between the following two equations:

##(1) v_2 = v_1 + a \Delta t##

##(2) v_2^2 = v_1^2 + 2a \Delta d##

My hunch is that ##(1)## represents the final speed in a non-parabolic scenario while ##(2)## is used when the object travels in an arc.

I was curious about this because the two equations won't produce the same answer when asked to find the "final velocity" of an object.

But they do produce the same answer and they both apply to uniformly accelerated motion.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top