Difference in radius, same power and intensity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between acoustic power and intensity as sound propagates through different spherical surfaces. The power remains constant at 0.12 W for both a 1.0m and a 5.0m radius due to the same sound source. However, the intensity decreases with distance, as calculated using the formula I = P/4∏r^2. This concept clarifies that while the power output of the source does not change, the intensity diminishes as one moves further away. Understanding this principle resolves the confusion regarding the differing intensity values at varying distances.
SPcle
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How much acoustic power propagates through a spherical surface (sound source in centre) with radius equal to 1.0m? with radius equal to 5.0m?

I = 10^-2 W/m^2
r = 1.0m or 5.0m
f = 50kHz
t = 2.0*10^-3s
IL = 100dB

Homework Equations


I = P/4∏r^2


The Attempt at a Solution


i figured out that when r = 1.0, power must be 1.3*10^-1W. However, when I work out the intensity when r = 5.0, i get:

10^-2 = P/4*∏*25
(10^-2)(4*∏*25) = P
3.1W = P

However, the answer states that the power for both spheres is 0.12W... What concept am I not understanding?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is the same sound source which produces I = 10^-2 W/m^2 at unit distance, so its power is 0.13 W. The same power propagates through any concentric spherical surface, with less and less intensity.

ehild
 
ooh, i see. so basically the power stays the same because it's the same sound source (a bat, in this case), but the intensity becomes a lot less in distance. i understand now, thanks!
 
SPcle said:
ooh, i see. so basically the power stays the same because it's the same sound source (a bat, in this case), but the intensity becomes a lot less in distance. i understand now, thanks!

You understood it quick:smile: You are welcome.

ehild
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top