Different Naming Systems in Textbooks: IUPAC Standards

AI Thread Summary
Different naming conventions for organic compounds, such as 2-butene and but-2-ene, are discussed, highlighting that both are acceptable under IUPAC standards. The conversation notes that IUPAC nomenclature has evolved over time, and it's advisable to consult the latest version of the Blue Book for the most current guidelines. The presence of varying naming systems in textbooks, including the use of older conventions in some educational programs like the IB, indicates a lack of uniformity across different countries and curricula. Overall, both naming formats are recognized, reflecting the ongoing development in chemical nomenclature.
Virogen
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I have encountered different naming systems in textbooks.

Ignoring cis/trans, for example, some textbooks would give the name 2-butene, while others give but-2-ene.

Are they both acceptable? The newer textbook uses the second type of naming, while the older textbook uses the first. Have the IUPAC standards changed?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
How odd, the IB program seems to be using the older system...
 
Different countries also have different systems. But generally they are both accepted.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top