I Different versions of Falkner-Skan equation

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter fahraynk
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on three different versions of the Falkner-Skan equations, highlighting their distinct formulations and the implications of their derivations. The first version includes a specific definition for beta, while the second and third versions differ primarily in the normalization of variables. The variations arise from different assumptions made during derivation, which can lead to equivalent results despite differing appearances. Sources for these equations include Schlichting's "Boundary Layer Theory" and an MIT open course material. Overall, while the equations differ in form, their underlying behavior remains consistent.
fahraynk
Messages
185
Reaction score
6
So I have seen 3 different version of the Falkner-Skan equations and I am wondering what is the difference between them?

The first version :
$$ F'''+FF''+\beta (1-F^{'2})=0\\\\
\beta=\frac{2m}{m+1}\\\\
U_e=aX^m $$

Second version:
$$F'''+\frac{m+1}{2}FF''+m(1-F^{'2})=0\\\\
U_e=aX^m $$

Third version :
$$F'''+(m+1)FF''+m(1-F^{'2})=0\\\\
U_e=aX^m $$

If I plus the formula for beta into the first equation I get ##\frac{m+1}{2}(F'''+FF'')+m(1-F^{'2})=0##
Clearly its not the same.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have the sources where you saw the different versions?

If by plus ##\beta## you mean multiple by ##\frac{1}{\beta}## and ##\beta## is now defined as ##\beta=\frac{2}{m+1}##, that looks okay. As for the difference between the F-S equations you're seeing, I'd first look at what assumptions were made during the derivation.

It'd be my guess that you'd find the answer there, or I could be totally wrong.
 
Thanks for your reply!

So the second version came from this book from some MIT open course
https://learning-modules.mit.edu/service/materials/groups/166456/files/3079b99e-d885-4950-a04a-21486cb994ec/link?errorRedirect=/materials/index.html
Chapter 3 Page 41of the above link.

The first version came from Schlichting's Boundary Layer Theory 9ed pg 169
But also I found it in the pages I posted below. (here there is a moving ramp in opposite direction of freestream and also suction at wall)
upload_2017-8-24_4-52-46.png

upload_2017-8-24_4-52-59.png

upload_2017-8-24_4-53-10.png

upload_2017-8-24_4-53-20.png


The third version came from a recitation of that class whose book was above. The only difference is it is not divided by a 2.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-8-24_4-53-6.png
    upload_2017-8-24_4-53-6.png
    6 KB · Views: 768
The difference is the choice of similarity variable. The behavior of all of the equations is effectively the same but the variables have been normalized slightly differently. It's similar to how you can find two versions of the Blasius equation.
 
  • Like
Likes fahraynk
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top