Differential cross section formula of electron-positron pair production.

salparadise
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to calculate the differential cross section in order of Mandelstam variable t, instead of the angle \theta. My problem is with the change of variable not the amplitude of the process. I'm getting a global minus sign which can only be wrong.

It seems I'm making a very basic error but I cannot find it.

Homework Equations


Starting from (p1+p2->p3+p4):

\frac{d \sigma}{d\Omega}=\frac{1}{64\pi^2s}\frac{\left|\vec{p}_3^{CM}\right|}{\left|\vec{p}_1^{CM}\right|}\left|M\right|^2

And knowing that for this particular process we have (t=(p_1-p3)^2):

t=m^2-2\left(E_{1}^0 E_{3}^0-\left|\vec{p}_3^{CM}\right| \left|\vec{p}_1^{CM}\right| cos(\theta)\right)=m^2-\frac{s}{2}+\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{s(s-4m^2)}cos(\theta)

I then calculate:

d\theta=-\frac{2}{\sqrt{s(s-4m^2)}sin(\theta)}

And use this in:

d\Omega=sin(\theta)d\theta d\phi

This global minus sign propagates then into the differential cross section \frac{d\sigma}{dt} and into the total cross section.

The Attempt at a Solution



Can someone please help me find where are my calculations failing?

Thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I've thought about it again, and I see that with the change of variable \theta \rightarrow t, the new limits of integration are [t_{max},t_{min}], since t decreases with \theta in the interval [0,\pi], which accounts for an extra minus sign.

I would delete the first post, but I don't think it's possible.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top