Differential Equations Text: Finding Rigor & Clarity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the need for a clear and rigorous text on differential equations that distinguishes between a function and its values, similar to the approach taken by Spivak in his Calculus. The confusion arises from traditional notations like y=y(x), which blur the lines between functions and their outputs. While some participants acknowledge that this distinction is often overlooked in applied mathematics texts, they emphasize its importance for a deeper understanding of the subject. Recommendations for suitable texts include works by Tenenbaum and Pollard, as well as Coddington, which address the distinction but may still use notation that complicates understanding. Additional resources are suggested, including links to books that cover differential equations and related concepts. The conversation reflects a commitment to mastering the material despite the challenges posed by conventional notation.
Rasalhague
Messages
1,383
Reaction score
2
Can anyone recommend an elementary but rigorous text on differential equations that takes care to distinguish between a function, f: X \rightarrow Y, and its value f(x) \in Y, as Spivak does in his Calculus. I find I'm getting rather confused by the traditional y=y(x) type dual-meaning notation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It seems you already know the difference between a function and a value it takes on. This is a pure math concern and not really the concern of an applied math book like a DE book, which tends to gloss over many math points. At any rate, confusing a function and it's values has a long and fine history, especially in elementary books; it's just something you have to get over. Perhaps you should try reading another book to get a different perspective? Here are two suggestions:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486649407/?tag=pfamazon01-20
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486659429/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:


It's my concern because I want to learn the subject and understand it properly. Tenenbaum and Pollard do explain the distinction in their opening chapter, but then switch to a notation that often hides it. It's no problem to me when they're talking about things I'm already familiar with, but when the discussion moves to defining new concepts in terms of functions of multiple variables, which may themselves be functions of other variables, it's not always clear to me what sort of object those variables are. Thanks for the recommendations, though. I'll keep working at it. And Coddington's book is new to me, so I'll certainly give that a look.
 


Thanks for the suggestions, atyy.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top