Differentiation under the Integral Sign

jakemf1986
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
This is not actually a homework question but something I saw in a (economics) journal article and have been having trouble getting. It's very simple so I thought I'd post it here.

Define the variable V (implicitly) by:

V=b + \int^{rV}_{0} rV dF(s) + \int^{\infty}_{rV} s dF(s),

where r is a constant and F has support on [0,∞).

Question: Show that \frac{dV}{db}=\frac{1}{1-rF(rV)},

My attempted solution: Differentiate with respect to V and use Leibniz's Rule to get

1=\frac{db}{dV} + r\cdot rVf(V) - 0 + \int^{rV}_0 r dF(s) + 0 - rVf(V) + 0 = \frac{db}{dV} + r^{2} Vf(V) + rF(rV) - rVf(V)

Rearrangement yields

\frac{dV}{db}=\frac{1}{1-rF(rV)+rVf(V)(1-r)}

Notice that my solution has an additional ugly term in the denominator.

Is my solution wrong? Or could perhaps a mistake have been made in the article?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump =)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top