polarized hopes said:
lets say 3rd order diffracted zone begins y=1m apart from y=0, where you observe m=0, and ends y=1.2m apart from y=0. Which tells us the width of the fringe is 0.2 m. Distance between screen and grating is 1m. so let's calculate
dsin(tetha)=m lambda
(5E-6)(1.2/sqrt(1^2+1.2^2))=3 lambda_max
(5E-6)(1/sqrt(1^2+1^2))=3 lambda_min
lambda_max=1.28 um
lambda_min=1.18 um
in short i mean the departure from the origin is important that gives the wavelength information out of the grating equation. lambda is a function of sin(tetha).
The width of the fringe is unimportant here; all that matters is its location. (Also, in your denominator on the left hand side of the equation it should be sqrt(1^2+(1/2)^2) since the total length of the screen is 1m, so from center to edge is 0.5m.)
Let me use the answers you gave in your first post to show what's wrong. In your first post you mentioned that the limiting wavelengths were blue and red light; let's assume that we use the textbook values for those wavelengths: 380nm and 750nm.
For a wavelength of 750nm, the third fringe occurs past the edge of the screen, so it does not have three orders visible on the screen, so 750nm is not an answer for the maximum wavelength. (The real answer, 745nm is close, though.)
For the wavelength of 380nm, if you calculate how many orders are visible, you will find that there are more than three orders of 380nm light visible on the screen, so that is not an answer for the minimum wavelength. The real answer (559nm) corresponds to having the fourth order be right at the edge, and so we could say that is the limit for having three order visible. (If the wavelength were any lower, there would not be exactly three orders visible on the screen.)
So the answers are 559nm and 745nm; any wavelength less than this will have more than three fringes visible on the screen, and any wavelength greater will have fewer than three fringes visible on the screen.