Diffraction Gratings, confusing question.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around understanding the variables in the equation for diffraction gratings, specifically λ=xd/nl. Participants clarify that d represents the distance between lines on the grating, which is 4.35*10^-6 meters, and n is the order of the line, set at 1. The value of x is calculated based on the number of lines (27) and the distance from the central maximum to the yellow mark, resulting in x being 0.135 meters. The conversation emphasizes that the physical distance measured does not depend on the type of ruler used, as long as the correct spacing of the lines is applied. Overall, the key focus is on correctly interpreting the variables and their units in the context of the diffraction grating formula.
skg94
Messages
78
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



f3e51k.jpg


zmgpkg.jpg


Homework Equations



λ=xd/nl

The Attempt at a Solution



Im having some difficulty with the variables, is d= lines/m? and n= 27? from the 50 mark to the yellow mark. then x would be 27*(4.35*10^-6) and l would be 100cm=1m ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
d is the distance between lines at the grating.
n is the order of the line. As you have just one line for each color (0 would correspond to light directed towards the tube), it is 1.

then x would be 27*(4.35*10^-6)
That looks like xd, but it has no units and where does the value of 27 come from?

and l would be 100cm=1m ?
Right
 
27 lines from thr 50 to yellow
 
Those are lines on the ruler, they are completely arbitrary (you could use a ruler with mm-marks as well). 13.5cm is the physical quantity, it does not depend on the type of ruler.
 
i just assumed that because of the each etched mark is 4.35*10^-6 apart, so d would be 4.35*10^-6 but x would be that times the 27 lines from the distance from central to the node.

So x =.135m d= 4.35*10^-6 l =1 and n= 1 so really the calculation is (.135*4.35*10^-6) ?
 
With units, yes.

Those lines ~4µm apart are at the diffraction grating, not at the ruler.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top