Number of Visible Diffraction Orders on a Grating

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sabrina_18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction Light
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the number of visible diffraction orders for light of wavelength 500 nm incident on a grating with 600,000 lines per meter. The initial calculation suggested that only one order of diffraction would be visible, but further analysis revealed that the correct approach involves determining the grating spacing and applying the diffraction equation. After recalculating with the correct values, it was concluded that three orders of diffraction would be visible. The final consensus confirmed that the calculations were accurate and the problem was resolved. Understanding the relationship between wavelength, grating spacing, and diffraction angles is crucial for solving such problems.
Sabrina_18
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How many orders of diffraction will be visible if light of wavelength 500nm fals on a grating with 600 000 lines per metre?


Homework Equations



n = dsinѲ / λ


The Attempt at a Solution



n = 6X10⁵m ÷ 5 X 10ˉ⁷m = 1.2
So 1 order of diffraction will be visible is this right??

I don't have the angle so I could put it into the equation.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that d is really (1/600,000) m, so that 600,000 lines would fit in 1 m.
 
Another way to pose this question is: how many maxima do you see between theta=0 and theta=90 degrees?

Consider that for a maximum to appear on the wall or the screen in front of the grating the angle theta can never be more than 90 degrees. (Recall that sin(theta) ~ (distance of nth maxima from the 0th maxima)/(distance of the grating from the screen).)
 
Thanks for your help. Here is my improved answer:
λ = 500nm = 5 X 10ˉ⁷m
d = 6 X 10⁵ per metre = 1 ÷ 6 X 10⁵ = 16.7 X 10ˉ⁷m
n = 16.7 X 10ˉ⁷ X sin 90 ÷ 5 X 10ˉ⁷ = 3.34
There will be 3 orders of diffraction visible

Is this correct? If not please tell me where I am going wrong

Thanks
 
Looks good. Problem solved :smile:
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top