Digital Logic - Timing Analysis

AI Thread Summary
Using a clock frequency above a component's rated limit can lead to circuit malfunction, as seen with integrated circuits that operate effectively at 45 MHz but fail at 50 MHz. Timing analysis is crucial in digital logic, as it ensures that signals are processed correctly within the operational limits of the components. For example, certain counters in the 74HC family may stop functioning at frequencies above 45 MHz. Additionally, frequency division in counters can result in outputs that do not meet desired specifications if the input frequency exceeds the component's capabilities. Understanding the specific chip and its intended use is essential for effective timing analysis in digital circuits.
ECE
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
What do they mean by saying that " If the clock frequency is 45MHz and we use 50MHz then the circuit will not work".

I am confused :rolleyes: I don't understand the timing analysis in digital logic.

Please help me out

-Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clock_signal"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_timing_diagram"

I'm hoping this will shed some light on your questions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The circuit in the link provided should answer your question completely: http://www.teahlab.com/multivibrators/jkflipflopv01/JKflipflopV01.html"
When J = K = 1, flipping the Clock signal should cause the flipflop to toggle, but because of the timing signal it won't.
To see how the circuit is actually supposed to work, set J = K = C = 1 then continuously click somewhere else on the board to witness the toggle action.

I hope this help. If you have more questions let me know.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ECE said:
What do they mean by saying that " If the clock frequency is 45MHz and we use 50MHz then the circuit will not work".

I am confused :rolleyes: I don't understand the timing analysis in digital logic.

Please help me out

-Thanks

Here's an old app note that talks about memory timing:

http://search.echelon.com/cs.html?url=http%3A//www.echelon.com/support/documentation/bulletin/005-0013-01D.pdf&charset=iso-8859-1&qt=external&col=&n=1&la=en

.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
45 MHz is near the upper limit of some integrated circuits.

Counters in the 74HC family of chips stop working at about 45 MHz so you could get an individual chip that will count 45 MHz pulses but will not count 50 MHz properly, or at all.

Another reason 50 MHz might not be suitable is that simple counters divide by some fixed integer quantity. They may divide by 10 to give 4.5 MHz from 45 MHz, for example.
If you clocked such a chip with a 50 MHz signal, the output would be 5.0 MHz and this may not be useful because you want 4.5 MHz.

You would need to ask about how the chip was being used, and what sort of chip it was.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top