Direction of cartesian equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the visualization of 90-degree angles in 3D space as represented on a 2D plane, leading to confusion about their appearance. It emphasizes that angles are defined as 90 degrees regardless of how they look when skewed in diagrams. The method involves drawing perpendicular lines from a vector to the axes, illustrating the angles in relation to the x-y plane. Participants suggest using alternative visualization techniques, such as manipulating paper to better understand the spatial relationships. Overall, the key point is that the angles remain 90 degrees by definition, despite potential visual misinterpretations.
goldfish9776
Messages
310
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


In this question, I didn't see why the given 90 degree is 90 degree becoz it doesn't look like 90 degree. Can someone draw me a better diagram? It's hard to visualize it's 90 degree

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • IMG_20150910_233254.jpg
    IMG_20150910_233254.jpg
    47.7 KB · Views: 411
  • IMG_20150910_233322.jpg
    IMG_20150910_233322.jpg
    24.3 KB · Views: 393
Physics news on Phys.org
Well it's trying to represent an angle measured in a 2D plane in 3D space on a 2D piece of paper. So it will always look skewed when the plane is not the same as the plane of the paper.
 
They are trying to illustrate the 90 degree angles in 3D space. A common way to visualize this is to subractthe Z component, and you will clearly see the right angles in the x-y plane.

The angles are 90 degrees by definition. You should not question it just because when it is illustrated at a skew angle it doesn't look like the square angle you are used to.

The method being used is one that involves drawing a perpendicular line from the end of A to whichever axis you are interested in. Since your new coordinates are defined with angles to the vector A from a given axis, the definitions are given in terms of cosine(angle) = adjacent (axis) divided by magnitude (vector).
 
RUber said:
They are trying to illustrate the 90 degree angles in 3D space. A common way to visualize this is to subractthe Z component, and you will clearly see the right angles in the x-y plane.

The angles are 90 degrees by definition. You should not question it just because when it is illustrated at a skew angle it doesn't look like the square angle you are used to.

The method being used is one that involves drawing a perpendicular line from the end of A to whichever axis you are interested in. Since your new coordinates are defined with angles to the vector A from a given axis, the definitions are given in terms of cosine(angle) = adjacent (axis) divided by magnitude (vector).
well , i still don't understand . take an example , alpha already more than 90 degree. How can the other angle be 90 degree? Can you explain in other words , so that i can understand better ?
 
goldfish9776 said:
well , i still don't understand . take an example , alpha already more than 90 degree. How can the other angle be 90 degree? Can you explain in other words , so that i can understand better ?
How do you know alpha is more than 90° ? Remember, these are not plane triangles you are looking at. They are triangles in three dimensions which are drawn on a two-dimensional page.

A better way to look at these diagrams is to imagine that the right angles are showing that there are three planes which are parallel to the x-y plane, the y-z plane and the x-z plane and which are also perpendicular to one another.
 
I suggest you cut a corner off a piece of paper and view it at different angles to replicate the drawing views.
 
  • Like
Likes goldfish9776
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top