Direction of Electric Force in a E. Field?

AI Thread Summary
The electric force is a vector quantity, defined by both magnitude and direction, with magnitude always being positive. Describing a vector as "positive" or "negative" is generally not meaningful, as vectors can point in various directions in space. For example, in an electric field oriented at 30 degrees from the positive x-axis, a negative charge would experience a force in the opposite direction, which can be specified in angular terms rather than as "negative." Thus, the direction of the electric force should be described using specific angles rather than labeling it as negative. Understanding the vector nature of electric force is crucial for accurate representation in physics.
K.z_z
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Member warned to use the template.
Is the electric force negative when it is in opposite direction as the electric field? If it is, a positive charge would always have a positive E. force? thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello K.z_z and welcome to PF!

Force and electric fields are vectors. The best way to specify a vector quantity is to give the magnitude of the vector and the direction of the vector. The magnitude is always a positive number. In general, there are an infinite number of possible directions that a vector can point in 3 dimensional space (or 2 dimensional space). So, saying that a vector is "positive" or "negative" does not usually have much meaning. Sometimes a vector points in, say, the positive x direction of some coordinate system, and then you can just say that the direction of the vector is "in the positive x direction". But, in general, a vector will point in some direction that cannot be specified by saying that the vector is "positive" or "negative".

For example, suppose you have an electric field that lies in the x-y plane and points in a direction of 30 degrees counterclockwise from the positive x axis. If you place a negative charge in this field, then the force would be in the opposite direction to the electric field. So, you could specify the direction of the force as 210 degrees counterclockwise from the positive x-axis (or, equivalently, 30 degrees below the negative x axis, etc.) But giving the direction of the force by saying that it is "a negative force" would not be a valid way of describing the force.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top