Direction of r-hat | Physics 2 Explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Smooth23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the direction of r-hat in the context of the Biot-Savart law in Physics 2. Users express confusion about how r-hat is determined, particularly in relation to specific problems from old exams. It is clarified that r-hat should always point from the current segment towards the point where the magnetic field is evaluated. In one example, the incorrect direction of r-hat did not affect the final answer, but in another instance, it did create confusion. The conversation emphasizes the importance of consistent notation across different textbooks for clarity in problem-solving.
Smooth23
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Okay, the biggest problem I'm still having 12 weeks into physics 2 is that I cannot for the life of me see how the direction of r-hat is determined. Can anyone explain it to me? Specifically in regards to Biot-Savart law, etc.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please tell us which textbook you're using. Different textbooks unfortunately use different notations and conventions for things like this. If you can show us the equations that you're looking at, someone who knows the subject well can probably figure out what's what.
 
Okay, I'm studying for a test, looking at former solutions here: http://campus.mst.edu/physics/courses/24/Old_exams/e3_spring2012_solved.pdf
number 7 has me confused for line segments 1 and 2 why is r-hat in the given direction?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Okay, ##\hat r## is always supposed to point from the current (wire) segment ds towards the point P where you want to evaluate ##\vec B##. It's drawn backwards on segment 1. It should point towards P. It doesn't make any difference in the final answer because the contribution from segment 1 comes out zero either way.
 
Thanks, I realize it didn't make a difference in that particular problem. Another old test had a similar problem where it did make a difference, but was apparently labeled correctly that was really confusing the crap out of me.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top