Dirichlet eta approximate functional equation

Simpel
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Concerning Hardy-Littlewood approximate functional equation for the \zeta function
\zeta(s) = \sum_{n\leq x}\frac{1}{n^s} \ + \ \chi(s) \ \sum_{n\leq y}\frac{1}{n^{1-s}} \ + \ O(x^{-\sigma}+ \ |t|^{\frac{1}{2}-\sigma}y^{\sigma - 1})
does somebody know of any similar result for the Dirichlet \eta function ? where \eta (s) is defined as
\eta(s) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n^s} = 1-\frac{1}{2^s}+\frac{1}{3^s}-\frac{1}{4^s}+-\ldots
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is something like this what you were looking for?
\eta(s) = (1- 2^{1-s}) \left( \sum_{n\leq x}\frac{1}{n^s} \ + \ \chi(s) \ \sum_{n\leq y}\frac{1}{n^{1-s}} \ + \ O(x^{-\sigma}+ \ |t|^{\frac{1}{2}-\sigma}y^{\sigma - 1}) \right)
 
that would be too easy,
but that was my fault, as I should have better described what I meant by "similar".
I am interested in expressing the Dirichlet eta function in terms of its partial sums, as well as of the partials sums of its critical line symmetrical one. So, I am looking for something like this (the ? is for a unknown-to-me function, and I am not even sure that such an approximate functional equation might exist ...) :
\eta(s) = \sum_{n\leq x}\frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n^s} \ + \ ?(s) \ \sum_{n\leq y}\frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n^{1-s}} \ + \ O( ...)
I would also be happy to try out directly on the Dirichlet Eta (if it makes any sense at all) the method followed by Hardy to get the approximate functional equation for the Zeta function, but I have googled around without finding any detailed description of such method, would anybody know a useful reference ?
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top