Discharging capacitor in a grounded circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter tourjete
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor Circuit
tourjete
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the circuit below, the capacitors labeled C1 and C2 both have capacitance C.
They are connected through a switch and a resistor of resistance R. Capacitor
C1 is initially charged with a potential V1(0) at time t = 0, while capacitor C2
is uncharged at time t=0.
At time t = 0, the switch is closed and the charge on C1 begins to move to C2.
Write a differential equation for the time dependence of V1(t) and V2(t). Solve
for the time dependence of the voltage across C2 for times after t = 0 when the
switch is closed

The circuit picture can be seen here: http://imgur.com/uy36j0z


Homework Equations



Kirchoff's laws
Ohm's Law
Q = CV for a capacitor



The Attempt at a Solution



Obviously, charge is conserved so Q_1(t) + Q_2(t) = Q_1(0). This also means that \frac{d Q_1}{dt} = -\frac{d Q_2}{dt} = 0.

I tried to use Kirchoff's laws and got:
0 = V_1(t) + IR + V_2(t) = \frac{Q_1(t)}{C} + R \frac{dQ_1(t)}{dt} + \frac{Q_2(t)}{C} = \frac{Q_1(0)-Q_2(t)}{C} - R \frac{dQ_2(t)}{dt} + \frac{Q_2(t)}{C}.

However, I'm a little concerned here due to two things: Solving this differential equation gives something linear in time instead of exponential, as I intuitively know that it must be, and I haven't taken into account the portion of the circuit that is grounded. What am I doing wrong? (Once I find the charge it is trivial to get V from that)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tourjete said:

Homework Statement



In the circuit below, the capacitors labeled C1 and C2 both have capacitance C.
They are connected through a switch and a resistor of resistance R. Capacitor
C1 is initially charged with a potential V1(0) at time t = 0, while capacitor C2
is uncharged at time t=0.
At time t = 0, the switch is closed and the charge on C1 begins to move to C2.
Write a differential equation for the time dependence of V1(t) and V2(t). Solve
for the time dependence of the voltage across C2 for times after t = 0 when the
switch is closed

The circuit picture can be seen here: http://imgur.com/uy36j0z


Homework Equations



Kirchoff's laws
Ohm's Law
Q = CV for a capacitor



The Attempt at a Solution



Obviously, charge is conserved so Q_1(t) + Q_2(t) = Q_1(0). This also means that \frac{d Q_1}{dt} = -\frac{d Q_2}{dt} = 0.

That last part at the end "=0" looks incorrect.

I tried to use Kirchoff's laws and got:
0 = V_1(t) + IR + V_2(t) = \frac{Q_1(t)}{C} + R \frac{dQ_1(t)}{dt} + \frac{Q_2(t)}{C} = \frac{Q_1(0)-Q_2(t)}{C} - R \frac{dQ_2(t)}{dt} + \frac{Q_2(t)}{C}.

However, I'm a little concerned here due to two things: Solving this differential equation gives something linear in time instead of exponential, as I intuitively know that it must be, and I haven't taken into account the portion of the circuit that is grounded. What am I doing wrong? (Once I find the charge it is trivial to get V from that)

I believe you have a sign error in the loop equation that you wrote. The signs of the two capacitor voltages should be opposite, IMO.

But I would approach the question a bit differently. You know the current is the same around the loop, so I would write the KCL at the two nodes (two sides of the resistor) and solve...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top