Discontinuity at x=0: Sketch sin(1/x), xsin(1/x), and x^2sin(1/x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter bigevil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on sketching the functions sin(1/x), x sin(1/x), and x^2 sin(1/x) to demonstrate their discontinuity at x=0. The user outlines their approach to graphing sin(1/x) and identifies the oscillatory behavior as x approaches 0, noting that the function oscillates between -1 and 1 with increasingly smaller intervals. They express uncertainty about breaking down x sin(1/x) into simpler components but acknowledge that the overall shapes of the graphs are similar. The user concludes that while the functions x sin(1/x) and x^2 sin(1/x) are continuous at 0, they remain undefined at that point, emphasizing the importance of sketching the curves without needing exact turning points. The discussion highlights the complexity of analyzing these functions while seeking a non-calculus-based solution.
bigevil
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Sketch sin (1/x), x sin (1/x) and x^2 sin (1/x) and show they are discontinuous at x=0.

The Attempt at a Solution



I *know* how to do this problem with the usual curve sketching methods (important points, asymptotes, turning points, "tends to") but my book has a method that involves breaking the compound function into smaller ones. I don't know how to break x sin (1/x) into compound functions, though. I don't think it's necessary to totally break it down anyway since the graphs all have about the same shape.

I can do sin (1/x)... I think... do check my solution too.

y = f(x) = sin (1/x)
w = g(x) = 1/x
u = h(x) = sin w

sin w can reach 1 when w = π/2, 5π/2... and -1 when w = 3π/2, 7π/2...
and is 0 for any integral multiple of π.

Substituting for x, sin (1/x) reaches

1 when x = 2/π, 2/5π...
-1 when x = 2/3π, 2/7π...
0 for x = 1/kπ and k is any integer.

Deduce that f(x) tends to slightly below 0 at negative infinity and slightly above 0 at positive infinity.

Also substitute values for x = 1/kπ: 1/π, 1/2π, 1/3π, 1/4π

When plotting a graph the intervals between successive 0s become smaller to negligible. Formula for 1, -1 also have similar form, so values for -1, 1 and 0 cluster as x tends towards 0 (or k tends towards infinity). By inspection the values oscillate between 1, 0 and -1, and that describes the graph of sin (1/x). Graph is discontinuous for 1/x at x=0.

I could do the rest using calculus, but I'm told there may be no need to (or told this so that I have to do everything the long way). The values for 0 should be at the same value for x in all 3 equations. I *know* that the y values of the turning points are not the same, but that's after differentiation.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Calculus method: differentiating the latter two expressions gives is

f(x) = x sin (1/x)
f'(x) = sin(1/x) - (1/x) cos(1/x)

g(x) = x^2 sin (1/x)
g'(x) = 2x sin(1/x) - cos(1/x)

when f'(x), g'(x) = 0

tan(1/x)=1/x for f(x)
tan(1/x)=1/2x for g(x)

We can get these values at our own leisure (isn't this fun...) by substituting for 1/x, eg

h(v) = tan v - v
j(u) = tan u - 0.5v

and applying the Newton-Raphson iterative method. That's pretty tedious, considering that the function oscillates an infinite number of times as it tends to 0, which is why I'm seeking a non-calculus solution. I don't *need* to know where the points are specifically. I've deduced graph shapes and the coordinates of all points where y=0, the final bit is how the turning point coordinates vary.
 
If you've deduced graph shapes you should know x*sin(1/x) and x^2*sin(1/x) are continuous at 0, aside from the technicality that they aren't defined there.
 
I know that, Dick... all 3 equations have the term sin (1/x), which is undefined at 0. But I also have to sketch the three curves, of which I have done one. I know the points where y=0 for all three curves, and how they look like, but the problem is the the turning points.
 
I think you only need a rough sketch of the function. No need to compute exact turning points etc. There are a infinite number of them...
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top