Discover if This Circuit Will Work with Affordable and Lazy Solutions - Jamie

  • Thread starter Thread starter JJM596
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Work
AI Thread Summary
The circuit Jamie proposed will not work because it has only one side of the battery connected, causing all LED legs to share the same power rail. Dave emphasizes the importance of using schematic diagrams over pictorial representations for clarity and accuracy in circuit design. He offers to draw a proper schematic to guide Jamie in building the circuit correctly. Jamie is encouraged to transfer the schematic to a breadboard and share a picture for verification before powering it up. Proper orientation of the LEDs is also highlighted as crucial for functionality.
JJM596
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,
i was wondering would this circuit work? don't want to buy a 100 buttons if it's not going to work as i am cheap and lazy :)

Thanks,
Jamie
 

Attachments

  • ScreenHunter_373 Aug. 17 21.51.jpg
    ScreenHunter_373 Aug. 17 21.51.jpg
    39.8 KB · Views: 485
Engineering news on Phys.org
hi you Jamie

no it wont, because you only have one side of the battery connected
and ALL legs of the LED's etc are connected to that one power rail

This is what you have ... see the problem ? ...

attachment.php?attachmentid=72232&stc=1&d=1408313302.gif



I will draw you what you need :smile:

attachment.php?attachmentid=72233&stc=1&d=1408313299.gif




Dave
 

Attachments

  • untitled1.GIF
    untitled1.GIF
    1.4 KB · Views: 569
  • untitled2.GIF
    untitled2.GIF
    1.2 KB · Views: 568
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Schematic circuit diagrams are much more useful than quasi pictorial diagrams. It's a good idea to learn to use schematics as a matter of course. If someone is not planning to use breadboard, then they need to translate twice and the symbols can be a bit vague if you don't stick to the rules.
It's a bit like showing pictures of piles of beans rather than using numerical symbols, to describe an arithmetic operation.

Dave has demonstrated very well, how to do the 'properly'.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Jamie,
can you now take that circuit I have shown you and transfer it to your breadboard ?

have a go and show us a pic before you put power onto the board so we can make sure its OK :smile:
Make sure you have the LEDs orientated the correct way

cheers
Dave
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top