Discrete Energy Levels: Questions & Answers

AI Thread Summary
Electrons in atoms transition between discrete energy levels instantaneously, with no intermediate states, according to current understanding. This transition occurs when an electron absorbs a photon, which provides the necessary energy for the jump. However, excitation can also result from other mechanisms, such as collisions with accelerated electrons in gases. The discussion highlights that while discrete energy levels exist, the wavefunction of an electron can extend over space, complicating the concept of energy states. Overall, the nature of these transitions reflects the quantum mechanical principles governing atomic behavior.
BOAS
Messages
546
Reaction score
19
Hello,

I have a question regarding discrete energy levels of atoms.

If electrons must inhabit certain energy levels, when they are excited up to a higher energy level, do they instantaneously jump to that level, or do they exist for some short time 'in between'?

Furthermore, if the wavefunction of an electron extends over space (infinitely far?), does it really mean that there is the highest probability that the electron inhabits the energy level, or does an energy level correspond to a large 'space'?

We've been looking at the bohr model which would suggest that these energy levels must exist on equipotential lines, but I remember from A-level chemistry the shape of different orbitals and clearly something else is going on here...

I know that's a bit of a loose question, but i'd enjoy a wide ranging answer :)

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BOAS said:
Hello,

I have a question regarding discrete energy levels of atoms.

If electrons must inhabit certain energy levels, when they are excited up to a higher energy level, do they instantaneously jump to that level, or do they exist for some short time 'in between'?

There is no "in between". Our current understanding is that this transition is instantaneous.

Note that these electrons are no longer classical particles, and these are energy states.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
There is no "in between". Our current understanding is that this transition is instantaneous.

Note that these electrons are no longer classical particles, and these are energy states.

Zz.

The way you wrote that made me realize something, I think.

The picture I had in my head was the electron having to go from a to b, i.e travel some distance to correspond to it's new energy level. But if it's gain in energy is dictated by the energy of a photon, which is itself a discrete packet of energy, the moment that absorption takes place, the electrons energy has jumped to the new level.
 
BOAS said:
The way you wrote that made me realize something, I think.

The picture I had in my head was the electron having to go from a to b, i.e travel some distance to correspond to it's new energy level. But if it's gain in energy is dictated by the energy of a photon, which is itself a discrete packet of energy, the moment that absorption takes place, the electrons energy has jumped to the new level.

Just so you know, the transition to higher energy states can due NOT to just photon absorption. In a fluorescent light, the gasses are bombarded by electrons that have been accelerated in the gas tube. Atoms can be excited via many mechanism, not just photon absorption. Collisions with other particles are quite common!

Zz.
 
If electrons must inhabit certain energy levels, when they are excited up to a higher energy level, do they instantaneously jump to that level, or do they exist for some short time 'in between'?
If you allow only a discrete set of states, the transition has to be instantaneous, because there is no state in between that could be occupied in the mean time. If by state you mean one of discretely indexed states of definite energy, you are making a preference for states associated with definite energy and not other physical quantities, say position or momentum.

If you allow continuous set of states, the transition may take some time. If by state you mean ##\psi## function figuring in the Schroedinger equations, there is a continuous set of states and no physical quantity is preferred. If you assume ##\psi## changes according to the time-dependent Schroedinger equation, it changes continuously and transition from one Hamiltonian eigenfunction to another, if it happens at all, takes some time.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top