Distance on arrays of unit-quaternions

  • Thread starter Thread starter mnb96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arrays
mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,
let's take the algebra of quaternions \mathcal{C}\ell_{3,0}^+ and consider only the sub-algebra of unit-quaternions.
When we wanted to define a https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2911801&postcount=6" we used the fact that unit-quaternions lie on the \mathcal{S}^3 sphere.

Now, what happens if we instead consider the whole set of finite "arrays" (q_1,\ldots,q_n), in which each entry qi is a unit-quaternion?

Is it possible that an n-tuple (q_1,\ldots,q_n) represent a point on some manifold?
If so, how can we compute the geodesic distance between two n-tuples?

Thanks!


EDIT:
a simplified question could be: given a vector of unit complex numbers, can we consider this vector as a point of some manifold?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
mnb96 said:
Hello,
let's take the algebra of quaternions \mathcal{C}\ell_{3,0}^+ and consider only the sub-algebra of unit-quaternions.
When we wanted to define a https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2911801&postcount=6" we used the fact that unit-quaternions lie on the \mathcal{S}^3 sphere.

Now, what happens if we instead consider the whole set of finite "arrays" (q_1,\ldots,q_n), in which each entry qi is a unit-quaternion?

Is it possible that an n-tuple (q_1,\ldots,q_n) represent a point on some manifold?
Yes. We can simply consider direct products. Here are some equivalent presentations:
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/journey-manifold-su2mathbbc-part/
If so, how can we compute the geodesic distance between two n-tuples?
Depends on the metric considered.
Thanks!EDIT:
a simplified question could be: given a vector of unit complex numbers, can we consider this vector as a point of some manifold?
There is a difference between a vector and a point so your question is a bit unclear. Every point described via coordinates can be considered a point of a manifold. Which manifold might be the more interesting question as there is no unique answer.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
12K
2
Replies
61
Views
9K
Replies
42
Views
10K
4
Replies
175
Views
25K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top