Distance Protection: Why Preferable for Medium & Long TLs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abrowaqas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Protection
AI Thread Summary
Distance protection is preferred for medium and long transmission lines due to its ability to measure impedance, which provides accurate fault location and isolation. Unlike differential protection, which requires a direct comparison of current at both ends of the line, distance protection operates independently of load current, making it more reliable over longer distances. Differential protection can be less effective in scenarios with varying load conditions, while distance protection remains consistent. Additionally, distance protection can cover longer spans without the need for extensive communication between terminals. Overall, the choice of distance protection enhances operational efficiency and reliability in medium and long transmission line applications.
abrowaqas
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
Why Distance( Impedance) protection is always preffered in the Transmission Lines protection?

As for as Short TL is concern, Sometimes we use distance as well as differential protection, but in Medium and Long Transmission Lines only Distance protection is used .. why is it so? what's the reason behind ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What's the difference between the two schemes? What element in the of differential protection scheme that isn't used in the distance scheme?
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top