Distributed vs concentrated loads

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marchese_alex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Distributed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the definitions of concentrated and distributed loads, emphasizing that a concentrated load occurs when the contact area is small compared to the receiving body. It highlights that while all loads can be viewed as distributed, a small mass on a long beam can be treated as a point load. The conversation also addresses specific calculations regarding moments and force components, noting that certain forces do not produce moments about specific points due to their alignment. Additionally, it explains how to determine the values of force components using trigonometric relationships in a right triangle. The overall focus is on understanding load types and applying geometric principles to structural analysis.
Marchese_alex
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
According to my book(mechanics of materials) the definition for concentrated load is when the area of contact of one body is small in comparison to the total area of the other body. So, small area in contact with big area equals concentrated load, but was watching an example on you tube that confused me. He was saying that when the foot touch the ground when walking it received a distributed load from the ground on the foot. Why? Area of foot < area ground

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you get down to it, all of your loads are really distributed loads. But say you are considering the load on a 60 foot long beam and you place a a 1 inch x 1 inch mass somewhere along it, in that case you can consider the mass to be a point load.

If you were considering the a 2inch long beam, then mass would be distributed.

In the video, the ground they were most like talking about was not the entire area of the country, but just the small piece surrounding the foot.
 
Ok thanks
 
I have a question with this one.

1.Why they didnt considered Fcd(4/5) when calculating moment at A? Is it Because when multiplied by the distance is zero? like so, Fcd(4/5)(0)

2. How do I determine the values of the triangle of Fcd? When I took static I never had to find them. BTW, they are h=5,y=3,x=4
 

Attachments

  • photo.jpg
    photo.jpg
    27.1 KB · Views: 525
1. Fcd (4/5) is the horizontal component of Fcd. Since it is inline with point A, there is no moment produced about A.

2. Don't you know trigonometry? You can find the component ratios from the sides of the 3-4-5 triangle.
 
no...
 
How about Pythagoras?
 
how do I get an hypotenuse of 5 from square root of 1.5^2+2^2?
 
You are mixing up different parts of the force Fcd diagram with the dimensions of the frame. The triangle attached to Fcd is 3-4-5, which satisfies the Pythagorean theorem.
The diagonal support measures 2 meters from A to C, and 1.5 meters from A to D.
The distance from D to C is not 5 meters but 2.5 meters. Therefore, triangle ACD is similar to a 3-4-5 triangle. Knowing the magnitude of Fcd (12,262.5 N), you can work out the components by using ratios.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
27K
Back
Top