Distributing two bosons among four states

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mechdude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bosons States
Mechdude
Messages
108
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



calculate the possible number of ways of distributing 2 particles among four energy startes when:
particle are distinguishable and there is no restriction on the occupancy of the energy state

Homework Equations



\frac{(n+g-1)}{n!(g-1)!}


The Attempt at a Solution


using the formula i get 10 ,
but on enumerating manually i get 16
since there will be four ways the two particles can go into the four states two at a time ,
then six ways they can go into t the four state one at a time , but since thy can be distinguished there's another six when they are interchanged ,
( 2 _ _ _ )
( _ 2 _ _ )
( _ _ 2 _ )
( _ _ _ 2 )

( a1 a2 __ __ )
(a1 __ a2 __ )
(a1 __ __ a2 )
(__ a1 a2 __ )
(__ a1 __ a2 )
(__ __ a1 a1)

these last six can be interchanged as i said tho get a total of 16.

i'm required to calculate this, but I am getting different results using the different methods what's up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bosons are indistinguishable, and so I think probably your equation there is for indistinguishable bosons.
 
my bad,
formula should have been
g^n
thanks
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top