Distribution of charge wrt static electricity

AI Thread Summary
Static electricity charge on the human body is influenced by the conductivity of shoes, which, while primarily insulative, still possess some conductivity. When walking on a rug, shoes can accumulate a negative charge that may induce a negative charge in other body parts, leading to a spark when touching a grounded object. The charge distribution involves both migration from the shoes and induction within the body, though the high resistance of the skin slows the current. Static electricity can have high voltage with insufficient current to cause harm, yet still be capable of damaging electronic components. Overall, the interaction between the charged shoes and the body results in a complex interplay of induced and migrated charges.
GRB 080319B
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
How is static electricity charge distributed over the human body if skin (1100 - 496,000 ohms) is a good insulator? For example, if one wears rubber-soled shoes and walks around on a rug, the shoes will obtain a negative charge. Then, if one touches a doorknob or some other metal object, a spark can result. My question is if charge is migrating from the shoes and being distributed throughout the body, or is the charge on the shoes creating an electric field that is inducing a negative charge in other parts of the body, such as the hands, which discharges to a grounded object? Is there a current or simply an induced charge?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hrmm. I think its a little bit of both effects, but I'm not sure. Remember that static electricity has a very high voltage, but very little current. I have had training on Electrostatic Discharge protection for electronic components, and it is possible for static electricity to damage an electronic component when you touch it, but not have enough current/voltage for you to even feel a shock. This is one way latent failurs happen in electronics. I'd say this is enough voltage to travel through your body, but little enough current to cause any harm.
 
Charge moves spontaneously from high potential to low potential. If the resistance is high, the rate is very slow.
 
If the sole of the shoe is perfectly insulating, it could charge the body only by induction. However the sole is very small compared to the body so you wouldn't get enough charge that way to feel a spark.
If you rub your shoes on a rug and get a spark the soles must be at least slightly conductive.
 
DrZoidberg said:
If the sole of the shoe is perfectly insulating, it could charge the body only by induction. However the sole is very small compared to the body so you wouldn't get enough charge that way to feel a spark.
If you rub your shoes on a rug and get a spark the soles must be at least slightly conductive.

Yes, shoes do have some conductivity. Just not alot. I don't believe there is a perfect insulator.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top