Divergence in Polar Coordinates

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 43K views
neutrino2063
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Why is
[tex]\nabla\cdot\vec{A}=\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(rA_{r})+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}(A_{\theta})[/tex]

Where
[tex]\vec{A}=A_{r}\hat{r}+A_{\theta}\hat{\theta}[/tex]
And
[tex]\nabla=\hat{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}+\hat{\theta}\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}[/tex]
Instead of just:

[tex]\nabla\cdot\vec{A}=\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(A_{r})+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}(A_{\theta})[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the unit vectors are actually functions of position in cylindrical coordinates. This means all the derivative in the gradient operator act not only on the components of a particular vector, but also the unit vectors themselves.