Divergence of B, circular current loop

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the divergence and curl of the magnetic field B in the context of magnetostatics, specifically for a closed wire loop with a steady current. The user notes that while the divergence of B should be zero according to the equations ∇ * B = 0 and ∇ X B = Mu * J, their calculations yield a non-zero result when considering the z-axis magnetic field above the loop. They emphasize the need to consider the full definition of divergence, including contributions from all spatial dimensions, and suggest using cylindrical coordinates for clarity. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the mathematical implications of magnetic field behavior in magnetostatics. The user seeks to resolve the apparent contradiction in their findings.
pobro44
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
∇ * B = 0 and ∇ X B = Mu * J. This is proved to hold not only for infinite wires but for magnetostatics in general.

Magnetostatics = steady current

Closed wire loop with constant current is certainly a magnetostatics example.

Magnetic field on z axis above loop around origin is: B = (Mu* I * R^2)/(2 * (R^2 + z^2)^(3/2)) in z hat direction

Homework Equations



Partial derivative with respect to z gives a non zero answer. Divergence is not zero. I am missing something obvious but fail to see what.

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Divergence is not just the partial derivative along z. Really think about the meaning of ##\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}_x}{\partial x}## and ##\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}_y}{\partial y}##.
 
Can also use cylindrical coordinates to verify ∇⋅B = 0. Look up the formula for div in cylindrical coordinates and apply to the problem.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top