Divergence of electrostatic field?

terryds
Messages
392
Reaction score
13
Poster has been reminded to post clear images and scans (not dark fuzzy phone pictures)

Homework Statement



By Gauss' law, how is it able to obtain ## \nabla \cdot \vec{E} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0} ## ?

By Coulomb's law, ##\vec{E} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{q}{r^2} \hat{r}##

I calculate the divergence of ##\frac{1}{r^2} \hat{r}## and get the result is zero

That means the divergence of ##\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{q}{r^2} \hat{r}## is also zero too.

How come it is ## \nabla \cdot \vec{E} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0} ## ?

Homework Equations



Gauss' Law
Coulomb's Law

The Attempt at a Solution



11ukq45.jpg
[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your computation is only valid for ##r > 0## where the charge density is zero. The divergence is a delta function at the origin, just as the charge density.
 
  • Like
Likes terryds
Orodruin said:
Your computation is only valid for ##r > 0## where the charge density is zero. The divergence is a delta function at the origin, just as the charge density.

So, what happens at point (0,0,0) ?The divergence is infinity or ##\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}##?
 
The divergence is ##q \delta^{(3)}(\vec x)/\epsilon_0## and so is the charge density/epsilon0. Both are "infinite" at the origin. (The proper treatment is to consider them distributions rather than functions)
 
  • Like
Likes terryds
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top